Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Set $f(x,y,z) = x + y + z + x^2 + y^2 + z^2$. Consider the surface

$$S = \{f(x,y,z) = 0\} \subset \mathbb{R}^3$$

near the origin $o = (0,0,0) \in S$. Write down the equation of the tangent plane $T_oS$. Prove that $(y,z)$ form a system of local co-ordinates on $S$ near $o$ and compute the Taylor series of the function

$$g = (x + xy + 3yz)|_S$$ at the point $o$ in the coordinates $(y,z)$ up to degree $2$.

I think for the first bit, to work out the tangent plane I need to partially differentiate $f$ at the origin, which would give me

$$T_oS = \frac{\partial f(o)}{\partial x}(x - o) + \frac{\partial f(o)}{\partial y}(y - o) + \frac{\partial f(o)}{\partial z}(z - o).$$

Is this correct for that bit?

I'm a little bit stuck on the second bit. Do I use this tangent space to get new coordinates for $x,y,z$ which I would then sub into $g$ and then try and expand to get the Taylor series?

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 0 down vote accepted
  1. About the equation of the tangent plane : just add "$=0$" and it will be correct. Indeed, recall that when a submanifold is defined as the zero set of a submersion (check that $f$ is one near $0$, i.e. that $Df(0) \neq 0$), then the tangent plane can be described as the kernel of $Df$.

  2. To prove that $(y,z)$ define local coordinates : use the implicit function theorem. (I'll go into more details if you want me to).

  3. Once you have proved that $(y,z)$ are local coordinates, write $x=\phi(y,z)$ where $\phi$ is the function defined by the implicit function theorem. Then note that for $(x,y,z) \in S$ near 0, $g(x,y,z)=\phi(y,z) + y \phi(y,z) + yz = \psi(y,z)$ and then compute the derivatives up to order 2 of $\psi$. You'll need the derivatives of $\phi$, which may be computed from the property $f(\phi(y,z),y,z)=0$ (as usual with the implicit function theorem).

share|improve this answer
This implicit function theorem thing is confusing me a little. I tried writing down the Jacobian matrix of this at $o$ and got the $3 \times 3$ identity matrix, is this correct? Do I then say $x = -y - z - x^2 - y^2 - z^2$ and then sub $x$ into $g$ and then expand and re-sub it if I need to get it in terms of just $y$ and $z$? –  Kaish Mar 6 '13 at 19:09
the function $f$ has domain $\mathbb{R}^3$ and range $\mathbb{R}$, so the same goes for its differential : it is a linear map from $\mathbb{R}^3$ to $\mathbb{R}$ so not a 3*3 matrix. the differential of $f$ at 0 is $Df(0)(x,y,z)=x+y+z$. in particular, $\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}=1 \neq 0$, so you may apply the implicit function theorem here. –  Glougloubarbaki Mar 6 '13 at 20:11
add comment

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.