Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

It is easy to think of $\mathbb{C}^2$ as an ordered pair. I just wonder if it is possible to put $\mathbb{C}^2$ into illustration, since $\mathbb{C}$ has taken the role of two dimensional Euclidean Space.

share|cite|improve this question
It depends whether you see $\mathbb{C}$ as a one-dimensional vector space over itself or as a bidimensional vector space over $\mathbb{R}$. In the first case you can try to see $\mathbb{C}^2$ as a plane but it won't be accurate, only a sketch. In the second case it would be impossible. – Marra Mar 5 '13 at 1:29
up vote 2 down vote accepted

In the same way that you can think of $\mathbb C$ as a two-dimensional object (but note that it would be inaccurate to view it as being exactly two dimensional Euclidean space since $\mathbb C$ has much more structure), so is possible to view $\mathbb C^2$ as a four dimensional object. For the same reason that $\mathbb C$ is not the same as Euclidean two-dimensional space, the resulting four dimensional object is not the same as $\mathbb R ^4$. Algebraically, this object is related to notions that generalize fields (i.e., the division ring of quaternions). It seems that you wish to understand $\mathbb C^2$ geometrically, for which it would help if you can visualize things in four dimensions. It's actually a bit easier than one might initially think, but certainly requires getting used to. Try thinking of the four dimensional simplex, and draw some of its projections onto three dimensional space. I hope this answers your question.

share|cite|improve this answer

Yes, this construction worked out in detail produces normed division algebras up to a point. The four-dimensional normed division algebra is the ring $\mathbb{H}$ of quarternions. You lose something along the way, though: the quarternions are not commutative. If you go one step further and create a normed division algebra out of $\mathbb{H}^2$, you get the octonions $\mathbb{O}$ which are not even associative. John Baez has a great article about this available here.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.