Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Consider $\ell^\infty $ the vector space of real bounded sequences endowed with the sup norm, that is $||x|| = \sup_n |x_n|$ where $x = (x_n)_{n \in \Bbb N}$.

Prove that $B'(0,1) = \{x \in l^\infty : ||x|| \le 1\} $ is not compact.

Now, we are given a hint that we can use the equivalence of sequential compactness and compactness without proof.

However, I don't understand how sequences of sequences work? Do I need to find a set of sequences and order them such that they do not converge to the same sequence?

Does the sequence $(y_n)$ where $y_n$ is the sequence such that $y_n = 0$ at all but the nth term where $y_n =1$ satisfy the requirement that it does not have a convergent subsequence?

I think I have probably just confused myself with this sequence of sequences lark. Sorry and thanks.

share|cite|improve this question

You have to find a sequence in $B'(0,1)$ which does not contain a convergent subsequence. Because the existenc of such a sequence implies (right from the definition) that $B'(0,1)$ isn't sequentially compact.

Hint Consider the sequence $(y^n)_n$ defined by $$y^n_k := \begin{cases} 1 & n=k \\0 & n \not= k \end{cases} \qquad (k \in \mathbb{N})$$ Then $y^n \in B'(0,1)$ for all $n \in \mathbb{N}$ and $\|y^n-y^m\|_{\infty}=1$ for $m \not= n$. This means that $(y^n)_n$ doesn't contain a Cauchy-subsequence, hence in particular no convergent subsequence.

share|cite|improve this answer

Let $E = \{ e_n \}_n$ where $e_n$ is the vector with $1$ in the $n$th position and zero everywhere else. Clearly $E \subset \overline{B}(0,1)$, hence it is bounded. Since $\|e_n - e_m\| = 1$ whenever $n \neq m$, it is clear that each point in $E$ is isolated. Hence $E$ is closed.

Now let $U_n = B(e_n, \frac{1}{2}$). Then $\{ U_n\}_n$ is an open cover of $E$ that had no finite subcover. Hence $E$ is not compact.

If you would rather use a sequential argument, choose the sequence $x_n =e_n$. As above, we have $\|x_n -x_m\| = 1$ whenever $n \neq m$, hence no subsequence can be Cauchy. Hence no subsequence can converge, hence $E$ is not sequentially compact.

share|cite|improve this answer

These are very intriguing examples but what condition of the Heine-Borel Theorem is absent? B-T says closed and bounded is equivalent to compact in at least all n dimensional real or complex sets. What specifically is missing in these examples for them to not contradict Heine-Borel?

share|cite|improve this answer

In answer to my own question, my first three attempts to state the Heine-Borel Theorem in n dimensional real space. Certainly a complete metric space would work! Can anyone soften the topological requirements of the Theorem?

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.