Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Does the following concept have a standard name? Has it been studied?

A sub-$\sigma$-algebra that has a null-set "surrounding" any null-set of the underlying $\sigma$-algebra.

More precisely, let $\left(\Omega, \mathcal{A}, \mu\right)$ be a measure space and define $\beta$ to be the collection of those sub-$\sigma$-algebras of $\mathcal{A}$ that are characterized by the following property: $\mathcal{B}\in\beta$ iff whenever $E\in\mathcal{A}$ with $\mu(E)=0$, there's some $F\in\mathcal{B}$ with $\mu(F)=0$ such that $E\subseteq F$.

As an example, the Borel field on the real line is a member of $\beta$ w.r.t. the Lebesgue field on the real line.

The utility of such a concept is, for instance, in that if $f_n$ is a sequence of $\mathcal{B}$-measurable functions that converge to a function $g$ $\mu$-almost everywhere, then $g$ is $\mathcal{B}$-measurable.

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 1 down vote accepted

In analogy with the "Lebesgue measure is Borel regular", perhaps something like $\beta$ is the collection of all sub-$\sigma$-algebras $\mathcal{B}$ of $\mathcal{A}$ such that $\mathcal{A}$ is "$\mathcal{B}$-regular". However, since the $\mu$-measure zero sets are not specified when you only mention the $\sigma$-algebras, it would probably be better to use terms that explicitly mention the measures and not just the $\sigma$-algebras. Note that a measure implicitly includes its underlying $\sigma$-algebra as part of the definition of the measure.

See, for example, how Dan Brigham handles these issues on pp. 93-96 of his May 2011 University of Missouri M.A. Thesis Quasi-Metric Geometry: Smoothness and Convergence Results.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thank you, Dave. – Evan Aad Mar 7 '13 at 6:28

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.