Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

$$ \frac{\partial u}{\partial t}=\alpha\frac{\partial^{2}u}{\partial x^{2}} \qquad u(x,0)=f(x)\qquad u_{x}(0,t)=0\qquad u_{x}(1,t)=2 $$ i'm trying to code the above heat equation with neumann b.c. using explicit forward finite differences in matlab. I used central finite differences for boundary conditions. $$ u_{x}(0,t)=\frac{u_{i+1}^{j}-u_{i-1}^{j}}{2h} $$ for i=1 ı used $$ u_{2}^{j}-u_{x}(0,t)2h= u_{0}^{j} $$ and for i=m $$ u_{m-1}^{j}-u_{x}(0,t)2h= u_{m+1}^{j} $$ Here my code and it doesn't give correct results. Actually i am not sure that i coded correctly the boundary conditions. I call the function as heatNeumann(0,0.1,0,1,0.1,0.0001,1) It would be good if someone can help.

function heatNeumann(t_i,t_f,a,b,dx,dt,alpha)

% dt: step size in time dimension
% dx: step size in x axes
% a: left point of domain x
% b: right point of domain x
% alpha: take 1
% t_i: t initial, t_f: t final



u0 = x.^2+1+cos(pi.*x);
T(:,1)=u0; %initial value
u_left = T(2,1); %boundary cond.
u_right = T(m,1)+4*dx; %boundary cond.

for j=1:n
    T(1,j+1)=T(1,j)+lambda*(T(2,j)-2*T(1,j)+u_left); %boundary cond.
    for i=2:m
    T(m+1,j+1)=T(m+1,j)+lambda*(u_right-2*T(m+1,j)+T(m,j)); %boundary cond.
    u_left = T(2,j+1);
    u_right = T(m,j+1);

%exact soln


[T(:,end) exact(end,:)']
share|cite|improve this question
up vote 1 down vote accepted

You have the right idea, your boundary condition is, $$u_x(t_n,x_0)=\frac{v_1^m-v_{-1}^m}{2h}$$ Now apply your scheme to get $v_0^{m+1}$. That is, $$v_0^{m+1} = v_0^m + b\mu[v_1^m - 2v_0^m + v_{-1}^m]=v_0^m + b\mu\left[v_1^m - 2v_0^m + \left(v_1^m-2hu_x\left(t_n,x_0\right)\right)\right]$$

And do the same for the right boundary condition. Then your BCs should become,

share|cite|improve this answer
Thank you @Stuart, now it is ok. – Ömer Mar 4 '13 at 20:26

Thank you @Stuart for your respond, but still the numerical results and exact results don't match. left column numerical, right column exact.

1.6305    1.5727
1.6123    1.5645
1.5790    1.5415
1.5368    1.5091
1.4946    1.4752
1.4626    1.4500
1.4522    1.4448
1.4745    1.4709
1.5395    1.5385
1.6551    1.6555
1.8264    1.8273
share|cite|improve this answer
My bad, I edited the answer. One of indexes was off by one. – StuartHa Mar 4 '13 at 20:01

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.