Tell me more ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

$$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{x^2}{x^6+9}dx$$ I'm a bit puzzled as how to go about solving this integral. I can see that it isn't undefined on -infinity to infinity. But I just need maybe a hint on how to go about solving the problem.

share|improve this question
1  
In general, I'm opposed to editing people's questions to correct them on issues like adding a $dx$; that's something that can be pointed out (e.g. in the comments) so they're aware of the change. Not a big problem though. – Zev Chonoles Mar 2 at 22:38
@ZevChonoles If you are talking to, ok, I will say next time that I add $dx$ (for example) in OP question/title...Maybe you say something different, sorry, my English is poor – Cortizol Mar 2 at 22:45

3 Answers

Hint: put $\;u = x^3$, so $\,du \;=\; 3x^2\, dx \;\implies\; x^2\, dx \;= \;\frac 13\, du$

This gives you $$\frac 13 \int_{-\infty}^\infty \frac {du}{u^2 + (3)^2} $$

Look familiar?:

Using one more substitution, let $\quad u =3\tan(\theta),\quad du =3\sec^2(\theta)\,d\theta, \quad \theta=\arctan\left(\frac{u}{3}\right)$

And determine the corresponding bounds for integrating.

share|improve this answer
1  
if u=x^3 dont you mean du=3x^2dx? – John Carpenter Mar 2 at 22:53
Thanks, @JohnCarpenter: typo fixed!! – amWhy Mar 2 at 23:02
Does this make sense? – amWhy Mar 2 at 23:30
It does but I'm hazy on how I need to fix my new upper and lower limits. – John Carpenter Mar 4 at 14:09

It is natural to let $u=x^3$. But note that the substitution $x^3=3u$ is more efficient.

share|improve this answer

With complex analysis: define the complex function

$$f(z)=\frac{z^2}{z^6+9}\;\;,\;\;\text{with simple poles at}\,\,\,z_k:=\sqrt[6] 9\,\,e^{\frac{\pi i}{6}(1+2k)}\;\;,\;k=0,1,2,3,4,5$$

Note that the only poles on the upper half plane are the first three ones $\,z_0,\,z_1,\,z_2\,$ , with residues

$$Res_{z=z_0}(f)=Res_{z=z_2}(f)=-\frac{i}{18}\;\;,\;\;\;Res_{z=z_1}(f)=\frac{i}{18}$$

Choosing the contour

$$C_R:=[-R,R]\cup\gamma_R:=\{z\in\Bbb C\;;\;|z|=R\,,\,\Im (z)\ge 0\}$$

we get, by Cauchy's Integral Theorem, that

$$(**)\;\;\;\;\;\;\;2\pi i\left(\sum_{k=0}^2 Res_{z=z_k}(f)\right)=\frac{\pi}{9}=\oint_{C_R}f(z)\,dz=\int\limits_{-R}^Rf(x)\,dx+\int\limits_{\gamma_R} f(z)\,dz$$

But

$$\left|\int\limits_{\gamma_R} f(z)\,dz\right|\le\max_{z\in \gamma_R}\frac{|z|^2}{|z^6+9|}\pi R\le\frac{\pi R^3}{R^6-9}\xrightarrow[R\to\infty]{}0$$

Thus passing to the limit in (**) above we get

$$\int\limits_{-\infty}^\infty\frac{x^2}{x^6+9}dx=\frac{\pi}{9}$$

share|improve this answer
Nice job, +1. You miss a $\mbox{Im}\;z\geq 0$ in the definition of your $\gamma_R$. I think. – julien Mar 3 at 3:52
Indeed so, @julien . Thanks. – DonAntonio Mar 3 at 3:53

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.