Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $X_t$ be collected from a Binomial distribution with parameters $N_t$ and $P_t$, where $N_t$ is known for $t= 1, 2, \dots , T$. On the other hand, $P_t \sim \operatorname{Beta}(\alpha_t, \beta_t)$. Using an Empirical Bayes estimation, we are interested in getting an estimate of $\alpha_t$ and $\beta_t$ based on the observations of $x_t$ we have.

share|cite|improve this question
Welcome to MSE! What are your thoughts? In which context did this question arise? Where are you stuck? – gnometorule Mar 2 '13 at 5:07
Sure you want the Beta distributions to depend on $t$? If so, one wants to estimate two parameters based on a single observation--a tad too optimistic, don't you think? – Did Mar 3 '13 at 8:49
Yes, it depends on t. That's why one uses Moment methods in EB. – Bromideh Mar 6 '13 at 4:51
I thought the combo (two parameters to estimate+one observation) would strike you as absurd. – Did Mar 7 '13 at 9:03

I think the question itself shows a lot of confusion. If you want EB estimates of0 $P_t$, you pretty much have to put a common prior on all $P_t$, i.e., $\alpha$ and $\beta$ cannot depend on $t$. If you want $\alpha$ and $\beta$ to depend on $t$, then perhaps you will need another level of prior on $\alpha_t$ and $\beta_t$. Even so, your set up has a potential identifiability problem, but the key is that, eventually, you need a common prior for all $t$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.