Tell me more ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Can $f(x)=\sin(x), x>0$ be represented by the series $\sum{a_n \sin(n \log(x))+b_n \cos(n \log(x))}$ ?

note: this is in continuation of another question that I asked earlier here

share|improve this question

2 Answers

up vote 8 down vote accepted

This depends on what you understand by represent. Consider the function $\sin(e^t)$ and its Fourier expansion on the interval $[0,2\pi]$: $$ \sin(e^t)\sim\frac{a_0}{2}+\sum_{n=1}^\infty(a_n\cos(nt)+b_n\sin(nt), $$ where $$ a_n=\frac{1}{\pi}\int_0^{2\pi}\sin(e^t)\cos(nt)dt,\quad b_n=\frac{1}{\pi}\int_0^{2\pi}\sin(e^t)\sin(nt)dt. $$ Standard convergence theorems show that the series converges pointwise to $\sin(e^t)$ in $(0,2\pi)$ (with uniform convergence on compact subintervals.) Fot $t=0$ and $t=2\pi$ it converges to $(\sin(1)+\sin(e^{2\pi})/2=0.9151\dots$ Morever, $$ \lim_{N\to\infty}\int_0^{2\pi}\Bigl|\sin(e^t)-\Bigl(\frac{a_0}{2}+\sum_{n=1}^N(a_n\cos(nt)+b_n\sin(nt)\Bigr)\Bigr|^2dt=0. $$

Now do the change of variable $x=e^t$. You get that $$ \frac{a_0}{2}+\sum_{n=1}^N(a_n\cos(n\log x)+b_n\sin(n\log x) $$ converges to $\sin x$ pointwise on $(1,e^{2\pi})$ and $$ \lim_{N\to\infty}\int_1^{e^{2\pi}}\Bigl|\sin x-\Bigl(\frac{a_0}{2}+\sum_{n=1}^N(a_n\cos(n\log x)+b_n\sin(n\log x)\Bigr)\Bigr|^2\frac{dx}{x}=0. $$

This all amounts to the fact that the functions $\{\sin(n\log x),\cos(n\log x)\}$ are a complete orthogonal system on the interval $(1,e^{2\pi})$ with respect to the weight $1/x$.

share|improve this answer

The series would satisfy (if the sum is s(x) ): $$ s(e^{2 \pi} ) = s(1) $$ This is not the case for the sine function. Therefore, it can't be done.

EDIT: fixed 0 to 1

share|improve this answer
Well, @yaakov: what do you mean by $s(0)$? The logarithmic function doesn't take values at x=0. – awllower Apr 8 '11 at 14:36
@awllower: my bad, of course I meant 1 – yaakov Apr 9 '11 at 20:50
It's ok, and then it helps clarify the mysterious term--$representation$. – awllower Apr 11 '11 at 12:01

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.