Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

The definite integral

$$\int_0^1\frac{\log^2(1+x)}x\mathrm dx=\frac{\zeta(3)}4$$

arose in my answer to this question. I couldn't find it treated anywhere online. I eventually found two ways to evaluate the integral, and I'm posting them as answers, but they both seem like a complicated detour for a simple result, so I'm posting this question not only to record my answers but also to ask whether there's a more elegant derivation of the result.

Note that either using the method described in this blog post or substituting the power series for $\log(1+x)$ and using



$$ \int_0^1\frac{\log^2(1+x)}x\mathrm dx=2\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{(-1)^{n+1}H_n}{(n+1)^2}\;. $$

However, since the corresponding identity without the alternating sign is used to obtain the sum by evaluating the integral and not vice versa, I'm not sure that this constitutes progress.

share|cite|improve this question
I evaluate several of these alternating Euler Sums by very elementary methods in this answer and this answer. – robjohn May 15 '14 at 14:26
Those are the Nielsen-Ramanujan constants. – Felix Marin Jun 29 '14 at 19:26

The similar integral

$$ \int_0^1\frac{\log^2(1-x)}x\mathrm dx=2\zeta(3) $$

is evaluated in this blog post using the substitution $u=-\log(1-x)$:

$$ \begin{align} \int_0^1\frac{\log^2(1-x)}x\mathrm dx &= \int_0^\infty\frac{u^2}{1-\mathrm e^{-u}}\mathrm e^{-u}\,\mathrm du \\ &= \int_0^\infty u^2\sum_{n=1}^\infty\mathrm e^{-nu}\mathrm du \\ &= \sum_{n=1}^\infty\int_0^\infty u^2\mathrm e^{-nu}\mathrm du \\ &= \sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac2{n^3} \\ &= 2\zeta(3)\;. \end{align} $$

Analogously substituting $u=\log(1+x)$ in the present integral leads to an integral up to $\log2$ that can be evaluated in terms of polylogarithms evaluated at $\frac12$:

$$ \begin{align} &\int_0^{\log2}\frac{\log^2(1+x)}x\mathrm dx \\ =& \int_0^{\log2}\frac{u^2}{\mathrm e^u-1}\mathrm e^u\,\mathrm du \\ =& \int_0^{\log2}\frac{u^2}{1-\mathrm e^{-u}}\mathrm du \\ =& \int_0^{\log2} u^2\sum_{n=0}^\infty\mathrm e^{-nu}\mathrm du \\ =& \sum_{n=0}^\infty\int_0^{\log2} u^2\mathrm e^{-nu}\mathrm du \\ =& \sum_{n=0}^\infty\int_0^{\log2} u^2\mathrm e^{-nu}\mathrm du \\ =& \frac13\log^32+\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac1n\left(-2^{-n}\log^22+2\int_0^{\log2} u\mathrm e^{-nu}\mathrm du\right) \\ =& \frac13\log^32+\sum_{n=1}^\infty\left(-\frac1n2^{-n}\log^22+\frac2{n^2}\left(-2^{-n}\log2+\int_0^{\log2}\mathrm e^{-nu}\mathrm du\right)\right) \\ =& \frac13\log^32+\sum_{n=1}^\infty\left(-\frac1n2^{-n}\log^22-\frac2{n^2}2^{-n}\log2-\frac2{n^3}\left(2^{-n}-1\right)\right) \\ =& \def\Li{\operatorname{Li}} \frac13\log^32-\Li_1\left(\frac12\right)\log^22-2\Li_2\left(\frac12\right)\log2-2\Li_3\left(\frac12\right)+2\zeta(3) \\ =& \frac13\log^32-\log2\log^22-2\left(\frac{\pi^2}{12}-\frac12\log^22\right)\log2-2\left(\frac16\log^32-\frac{\pi^2}{12}\log2+\frac78\zeta(3)\right)+2\zeta(3) \\ =& \frac{\zeta(3)}4\;. \end{align} $$

Not only is this a rather complicated derivation of a much simpler result; it also looks as if the polylogarithm values may have been obtained using the present integral in the first place.

share|cite|improve this answer
Nice! I think that your calculation can be generalized: $$\int_0^1 \frac{\log^n(1+x)}{x}dx=\frac{\log^{n+1}(1+z)}{1+n}-n! \sum_{j=1}^n \frac{\log^{n-j+1}(1+z)}{(n-j+1)!}\text{Li}_j \left(\frac{1}{1+z} \right)+n! \zeta(n+1)-n! \text{Li}_{n+1} \left( \frac{1}{1+z}\right)$$ – Shobhit Nov 21 '13 at 6:45

We can combine the present integral with the similar integral

$$ \int_0^1\frac{\log^2(1-x)}x\mathrm dx=2\zeta(3) $$

(see my other answer) into

$$ \begin{align} \int_0^1\frac{\log^2(1+x)}x\mathrm dx-\int_0^1\frac{\log^2(1-x)}x\mathrm dx &= \int_0^1\frac{\log^2(1+x)}x\mathrm dx+\int_{-1}^0\frac{\log^2(1+x)}x\mathrm dx \\ &= \int_{-1}^1\frac{\log^2(1+x)}x\mathrm dx\;. \end{align} $$

Then we can complete the contour of integration by a semicircle in the upper half complex plane:

$$ \begin{align} \int_{-1}^1\frac{\log^2(1+x)}x\mathrm dx &= \oint\frac{\log^2(1+z)}z\mathrm dz-\int\frac{\log^2\left(1+\def\e{\mathrm e^{\mathrm i\phi}}\e\right)}{\e}\mathrm d\e \\ &= -\mathrm i\int_0^\pi\log^2\left(1+\e\right)\mathrm d\phi\;, \end{align} $$

where the integral over the closed contour vanishes since there are no poles inside the contour.

We know that the imaginary part of this expression vanishes, since it sums to zero with a real integral, so we only have to evaluate the real part:

$$ \begin{align} -\mathrm i\int_0^\pi\log^2\left(1+\e\right)\mathrm d\phi &= \Re\left(-\mathrm i\int_0^\pi\log^2\left(1+\e\right)\mathrm d\phi\right) \\ &= \Re\left(-\mathrm i\int_0^\pi\left(\log\left|1+\e\right|+\mathrm i\arg\left(1+\e\right)\right)^2\mathrm d\phi\right) \\ &= 2\int_0^\pi\log\left|1+\e\right|\arg\left(1+\e\right)\mathrm d\phi \\ &= 2\int_0^\pi\frac12\log\left(2+2\cos\phi\right)\frac\phi2\mathrm d\phi \\ &= \frac12\int_0^\pi\log\left(\left(\mathrm e^{\mathrm i\phi/2}+\mathrm e^{-\mathrm i\phi/2}\right)^2\right)\phi\mathrm d\phi \\ &= \int_0^\pi\log\left(\mathrm e^{\mathrm i\phi/2}+\mathrm e^{-\mathrm i\phi/2}\right)\phi\,\mathrm d\phi \\ &= \Re\int_0^\pi\left(\frac{\mathrm i\phi}2+\log\left(1+\mathrm e^{-\mathrm i\phi}\right)\right)\phi\,\mathrm d\phi \\ &= \Re\int_0^\pi\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{(-1)^{n+1}\mathrm e^{-\mathrm in\phi}}n\phi\,\mathrm d\phi \\ &= \sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{-1+(-1)^n}{n^3} \\ &= -\zeta(3)-\eta(3) \\ &= -\zeta(3)-\frac34\zeta(3) \\ &= -\frac74\zeta(3)\;. \end{align} $$

The desired integral is the sum of the two results:

$$ \begin{align} \int_0^1\frac{\log^2(1+x)}x\mathrm dx &= \int_0^1\frac{\log^2(1-x)}x\mathrm dx-\mathrm i\int_0^\pi\log^2\left(1+\e\right)\mathrm d\phi \\ &= 2\zeta(3)-\frac74\zeta(3) \\ &= \frac{\zeta(3)}4 \;. \end{align} $$

This raises the question whether there's a deeper reason for both of these seemingly quite different integrals to evaluate to a multiple of $\zeta(3)$.

share|cite|improve this answer

$\newcommand{\+}{^{\dagger}} \newcommand{\angles}[1]{\left\langle\, #1 \,\right\rangle} \newcommand{\braces}[1]{\left\lbrace\, #1 \,\right\rbrace} \newcommand{\bracks}[1]{\left\lbrack\, #1 \,\right\rbrack} \newcommand{\ceil}[1]{\,\left\lceil\, #1 \,\right\rceil\,} \newcommand{\dd}{{\rm d}} \newcommand{\down}{\downarrow} \newcommand{\ds}[1]{\displaystyle{#1}} \newcommand{\expo}[1]{\,{\rm e}^{#1}\,} \newcommand{\fermi}{\,{\rm f}} \newcommand{\floor}[1]{\,\left\lfloor #1 \right\rfloor\,} \newcommand{\half}{{1 \over 2}} \newcommand{\ic}{{\rm i}} \newcommand{\iff}{\Longleftrightarrow} \newcommand{\imp}{\Longrightarrow} \newcommand{\isdiv}{\,\left.\right\vert\,} \newcommand{\ket}[1]{\left\vert #1\right\rangle} \newcommand{\ol}[1]{\overline{#1}} \newcommand{\pars}[1]{\left(\, #1 \,\right)} \newcommand{\partiald}[3][]{\frac{\partial^{#1} #2}{\partial #3^{#1}}} \newcommand{\pp}{{\cal P}} \newcommand{\root}[2][]{\,\sqrt[#1]{\vphantom{\large A}\,#2\,}\,} \newcommand{\sech}{\,{\rm sech}} \newcommand{\sgn}{\,{\rm sgn}} \newcommand{\totald}[3][]{\frac{{\rm d}^{#1} #2}{{\rm d} #3^{#1}}} \newcommand{\ul}[1]{\underline{#1}} \newcommand{\verts}[1]{\left\vert\, #1 \,\right\vert} \newcommand{\wt}[1]{\widetilde{#1}}$ \begin{align}&\color{#c00000}{\int_{0}^{1}{\ln^{2}\pars{1 + x} \over x}\,\dd x} =\int_{1}^{2}{\ln^{2}\pars{x} \over x - 1}\,\dd x =\int_{1}^{1/2}{\ln^{2}\pars{1/x} \over 1/x - 1}\,\pars{-\,{\dd x \over x^{2}}} \\[3mm]&=\int_{1/2}^{1}{\ln^{2}\pars{x} \over x\pars{1 - x}}\,\dd x =\int_{1/2}^{1}{\ln^{2}\pars{x} \over x}\,\dd x + \int_{1/2}^{1}{\ln^{2}\pars{x} \over 1 - x}\,\dd x \\[3mm]&={1 \over 3}\,\ln^{3}\pars{2} +\color{#66f}{\sum_{n = 0}^{\infty}\int_{1/2}^{1}\ln^{2}\pars{x}x^{n}\,\dd x} \end{align}

\begin{align}&\color{#66f}{\sum_{n = 0}^{\infty}\int_{1/2}^{1}\ln^{2}\pars{x}x^{n} \,\dd x} =\left.\partiald[2]{}{\mu}\sum_{n = 1}^{\infty}\int_{1/2}^{1}x^{\mu - 1} \,\dd x\,\right\vert_{\,\mu\ =\ n} =\left.\partiald[2]{}{\mu}\sum_{n = 1}^{\infty} {1 - 2^{-\mu} \over \mu}\,\right\vert_{\,\mu\ =\ n} \\[3mm]&=2\sum_{n = 1}^{\infty}{1 \over n^{3}} -2\sum_{n = 1}^{\infty}{\pars{1/2}^{n} \over n^{3}} -2\ln\pars{2}\sum_{n = 1}^{\infty}{\pars{1/2}^{n} \over n^{2}} -\ln^{2}\pars{2}\sum_{n = 1}^{\infty}{\pars{1/2}^{n} \over n} \\[3mm]&=2\zeta\pars{3} - 2{\rm Li}_{3}\pars{\half} -2\ln\pars{2}{\rm Li}_{2}\pars{\half} -\ln^{2}\pars{2}{\rm Li}_{1}\pars{\half} \end{align}

From this link \begin{align} {\rm Li}_{1}\pars{\half} &= \ln\pars{2} \\[1mm] {\rm Li}_{2}\pars{\half} &= {\pi^{2} \over 12} - \half\,\ln^{2}\pars{2} \\[1mm] {\rm Li}_{3}\pars{\half} &= {1 \over 6}\,\ln^{3}\pars{2} -{\pi^{2} \over 12}\,\ln\pars{2} + {7 \over 8}\,\zeta\pars{3} \end{align}

share|cite|improve this answer
Here is the attempt to evaluate $\text{Li}_1\left(\frac12\right)$ and $\text{Li}_2\left(\frac12\right)$. +1 – Tunk-Fey Aug 24 '14 at 17:20
@Tunk-Fey Thanks for your link. However, those values are well known. Any way, it's always nice to see that derivation. – Felix Marin Aug 24 '14 at 18:03

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.