In Emmy Noether's 1915 paper "Der Endlichkeitssatz der Invarianten endlicher Gruppen", I saw the notion of a 'Galois resolvent', which I don't quite understand. Google didn't really help me with that, since it seems to be different from what I have found to this notion. Let me try to translate what happens there:
We have a finite group $H$ of invertible $n\times n$-matrices $A_1,\dots,A_h$, where $A_k=(a_{ij}^{(k)})$, with entries in some field $K$ of characteristic $0$ (I'm actually not 100% sure if this is sufficient, in a later paper she talks about 'übliche Zahlkörper'). Then $H$ acts on the polynomial ring $K[x_1,\dots,x_n]$, where we set $x=(x_1,\dots,x_n)^T$, via
$$(A_k,x)\mapsto A_k\cdot x,$$
and we denote $A_k\cdot x$ also by $x^{(k)}$. Since one of the $A_k$ is the identity, there is a $k$ such that $x^{(k)}=x$.
Now a polynomial invariant of $G$ is some $f\in K[x_1,...,x_n]$ for which $A_k\cdot f=f$ for all $k$. In other words, we have
$$f(x)=f(x^{(1)})=\dots=f(x^{(h)})=\frac{1}{h}\sum_{k=1}^hf(x^{(k)}).$$
Now comes the part where I'm stuck, I try to translate it as good as I can:
This formula expresses that $f$ is a a polynomial, symmetric function in the $x^{(k)}$. The theorem about symmetric functions of "Größenreihen" (I don't know how to translate this) says that $f$ can be represented in a polynomial way by the elementary symmetric functions of these "Reihen" (series), that is, by the coefficients $G_{\alpha,\alpha_1,\dots,\alpha_n}(x)$ of the "Galois resolvent":
\begin{align*}\phi(z,u)&=\prod_{k=1}^h(z+u_1x_1^{(k)}+\dots+u_nx_n^{(k)})\\&=z^h+\sum G_{\alpha,\alpha_1,\dots,\alpha_n}(x)z^\alpha u_1^{\alpha_1}\cdots u_n^{\alpha_n}\begin{pmatrix}(\alpha+\alpha_1+\dots+\alpha_n=h)\\\alpha\neq h\end{pmatrix},\end{align*}
where the $G_{\alpha,\alpha_1,\dots,\alpha_n}(x)$ are invariants of degree $\alpha_1+\dots+\alpha_n$ in the $x_i$.
I actually don't have any idea where $u,z$ come from. I thought there was a nice expression for the elementary symmetric polynomials, and that they are coefficients of a much simpler polynomial. The theorem mentioned above isn't referenced further, I guess the main theorem on symmetric polynomials is meant, but I fail to get the connection to this strange formula.
I'd be glad if someone could help me out here, and explain where this 'Galois resolvent' comes from and what's the connection to the 'usual' stuff about symmetric polynomials. Thank you very much in advance!
