$\newcommand{\Tr}{\operatorname{Tr}}$
I am having trouble seeing the connection between the two kinds of trace. For a finite extension $K$ of a field $F$ of degree $n$, with $\alpha \in K$, we defined the Galois trace as $$ \Tr(\alpha) = \sum_{\sigma \in \mathrm{Gal}(K/F)} \sigma(\alpha) $$ We also showed that $\Tr(\alpha) = -a_{n-1}$, where $m_{\alpha, F}(x) = \sum_{i=0}^na_ix^i$ is the minimal polynomial for $\alpha$ in $F[x]$.
We have also shown that the minimal polynomial for $\alpha$, $m_{\alpha, F}(x)$ and the minimal polynomial for left multiplication by $\alpha$, $T_\alpha(g) = \alpha g$ for $g \in K$, denoted by $m_{T_\alpha}$, are in fact the same polynomial.
My question is: how can I now see that these two traces are equivalent: one is the sum of the Galois conjugates, and one is the sum of the diagonal entries of the $n \times n$ matrix representation of $T_\alpha$.
