Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

If we assume that $f(x)=ax^4+bx^3+cx^2+dx+e=a(x-r_1)(x-r_2)(x-r_3)(x-r_4)$ when $a,b,c,d,e$ are integers and $ a\neq0$. If $r_1+r_2$ is a rational number, and $r_1+r_2\neq$ $r_3+r_4$ how to prove that $r_1r_2$ is a rational number

share|improve this question
    
@ThomasAndrews not needed. $r_1+r_2\neq r_3+r_4$ –  Yimin Feb 27 '13 at 15:00
    
Whoops, forgot that. @Yimin –  Thomas Andrews Feb 27 '13 at 15:19

2 Answers 2

up vote 7 down vote accepted

You can see $r_1+r_2,r_3+r_4$ are rational.

And $(r_1+r_2)(r_3+r_4)+r_1r_2+r_3r_4$ is rational, thus $r_1r_2+r_3r_4$ is rational.

Also $(r_1+r_2)r_3r_4+(r_3+r_4)r_1r_2$ is rational.

Take $u = r_1+r_2,v=r_3+r_4,w=r_1r_2,z=r_3r_4$, then

$uz+vw = t$ as a rational number.

$w = \dfrac{t-uz}{v}$,consider $w+z$ is rational.

$w+z = \dfrac{t-uz}{v}+z = \dfrac{t+z(v-u)}{v}$, and $v-u\neq 0$, thus $z$ is rational!

So $w$ is rational!

share|improve this answer
    
Remark that the proof has a nice conceptual view in terms of quadratic integers - see my answer. –  Math Gems Feb 27 '13 at 17:48

Hint $\rm\quad\ \begin{eqnarray} f/a &\ =\ &\rm (x-r_1)(x-r_2) (x-r_3)(x-r_4)\\ &=&\rm (x^2-r\ x+w)\ \ (x^2-s\ x+w'),\ \ \ r = r_1\!\!+\!r_2,\ w = r_1 r_2,\ s = r_3\!\!+\!r_4,\ w' = r_3 r_4\\ &=&\rm\ x^4\! - (r\!+\!s)\, x^3 + (w\!+\!w'\!\!+\!rs)\, x^2\! - (rw'\!\!+\!sw)\,x + ww'\in \Bbb Q[x]\end{eqnarray}$

By hypothesis $\rm\ r\in \Bbb Q\:$. This, combined with the above polynomial coefficients $\in \Bbb Q,\:$ implies that the hypotheses of the Lemma below hold true, so the Lemma yields $\rm\:w,w'\in\Bbb Q.\quad$ QED

Lemma $\ $ If $\rm\,\ r,\ s,\ w\!+\!w',\ rw'\!+\!sw\:$ are all $\,\in \Bbb Q\,\ $ then $\rm\,\ r\ne s\:\Rightarrow\: w,w'\in \Bbb Q$

Proof $\rm\ \ (r\!-\!s)w' = (rw'\!+\!sw)-s(w\!+\!w')\in \Bbb Q\:\Rightarrow\: w'\in\Bbb Q\:\Rightarrow\:w = (w\!+\!w')-w'\in\Bbb Q$

Remark $\ $ The lemma is a special case of this: $ $ if a field $\rm\,F\,$ contains two $\rm\,F$-linearly independent combinations of elements $\rm\:w,w'\:$ from an extension field, then the linear equations expressing this have nonzero determinant, so we can prove that $\rm\,w,w'\in F\,$ by solving the system by Cramers rule. For example, the Primitive Element Theorem works this way, obtaining two such independent combinations by Pigeonholing the infinite set $\rm\ F(\sqrt{a} + r\ \sqrt{b}),\,\ r \in F,\,\ |F| = \infty,\:$ into the finitely many fields between F and $\rm\ F(\sqrt{a}, \sqrt{b}),$ e.g. see PlanetMath's proof.

Above $\rm\,ww'\in \Bbb Q,\,$ so we get a nice conceptual interpretation about the trace of quadratic integers. Indeed, note $\rm\: ww',w\!+\!w'\in \Bbb Q\:$ implies that $\rm\:w\:$ is the root of the quadratic $\rm\:(x\!-\!w)(x\!-\!w')\in\Bbb Q[x].\:$ The contrapositive of the Lemma implies that if $\rm\:w\:$ is an irrational quadratic integer, i.e. $\rm\:w\not\in \Bbb Q,\:$ then the only rational $\rm\,\Bbb Q$-linear combinations of $\rm\,w,w'$ are rational multiples of the trace; explicitly, if $\rm\:r,s\in\Bbb Q\:$ and $\rm\: v = rw'\!\!+\!sw\in\Bbb Q\:$ then $\rm\:r = s,\:$ so $\rm\:v = r\,(w'\!\!+\!w)\:$ is a rational multiple of $\rm\,trace(w).\:$

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.