Let $X$ be a reflexive Banach space with dual $X^*$. Let $K\subset X$ be a nonempty closed convex set. The mapping $F: K\rightarrow X^*$ is said to be:
weakly continuous if $F$ is continuous w.r.t. the weak$^*$ topology on $X^*$ and the induced topology on $K$;
continuous on finite dimensional subspaces if for any subspaces $M\subset X$ the restriction of F to $K\cap M$ is continuous w.r.t the weak$^*$ topology on $X^*$ and the induced topology on $K\cap M$;
hemicontinuous if for any $x, y\in K$ the restriction of $F$ to $[x, y]$ is continuous w.r.t the weak$^*$ topology on $X^*$ and the induced topology on $[x, y]$.
We are easy to verify that
weak continuity $\Rightarrow$ continuity on finite dimensional subspaces
continuity on finite dimensional subspaces $\Rightarrow$ hemicontinuity.
The reverse is not true in general.
I am stuck in constructing counterexamples for the reverse implication.
Thank you for all comments and helping.
