Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Is there any problem with expressing that, if $\displaystyle\lim_{n\to\infty} x_n = +\infty$ for some sequence $\{x_n\}_{n=1}^\infty$ then $$ \lim_{n\to\infty} P(x_n) = \lim_{x\to\infty} P(x)?, $$ where $P$ is a polynomial of the form $P(x)=a_0+...+a_n x^n$. How should I formalize these reasoning? Any hint for proving that $\lim_{n\to\infty} P(x_n) = \pm \infty$ if there exists $a_r\neq 0$ with $r\in\{1,...,n\}$? Thanks in advance and sorry for editing the question.

share|improve this question
4  
Well, that changed the question considerably. Strictly speaking though, $\lim_{x \to \infty} f(x)$ doesn't exist if $f$ is a polynomial (unless $f$ is constant). I assume you allow improper limits here? –  mrf Feb 26 '13 at 20:52
    
@mrf You're right, that's okay. I'm only trying to prove that $\lim_{n\to\infty} f(x_n) =\pm\infty$. –  V. Galerkin Feb 26 '13 at 20:56
add comment

1 Answer

If you already know that $\lim_{x\to\infty} f(x)$ exists (possibly as $\pm\infty$), it's true that $\lim_{x\to\infty} f(x_n) = \lim_{x\to\infty} f(x)$ for every sequence $x_n$ tending to $\infty$. (Whether $f$ is a polynomial or not.)

Just look at the definition of limit to see why this is true: By assumption $|f(x)-L| < \varepsilon$ for $x$ large enough. Hence $|f(x_n)-L| < \varepsilon$ for $n$ large enough (since $x_n \to \infty$ as $n\to\infty$.) Adapt the reasoning when $L = \pm\infty$.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.