Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $f:X \rightarrow Y $ be a morphism of S-schemes. Let us suppose that X is reduced and endow the image of the graph morphism $\Gamma_f:X \rightarrow X \times_S Y $ , call it A, with a reduced closed subscheme structure. Show that if Y is separated over S, then the projection $X \times_S Y \rightarrow X$ induces an isomorphism from A onto X.

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

The graph morphism $\Gamma_f : X \to X \times_S Y$ induces a morphism $g : X \to A$ which satisfies by definition $(p|_A) \circ g = 1_X$ and $(q|_A) \circ g = f$, where $p : X \times_S Y \to X$ and $q : X \times_S Y \to Y$ are the projections. Since $Y$ is separated over $S$, the graph morphism $\Gamma_f$ is in fact a closed immersion; this is easy, see for example (EGA I, (5.2.4)) (in the Springer edition). Hence there exists a closed subscheme $A' \subset X \times_S Y$ and isomorphism $g' : X \stackrel{\sim}{\to} A'$ such that $\Gamma_f$ factors through $g'$ and the inclusion, so $\Gamma_f = g \circ j = g' \circ j'$, where $j : A \hookrightarrow X \times_S Y$ and $j' : A' \hookrightarrow X \times_S Y$ are the inclusions. It follows that $p \circ j \circ g = p \circ j' \circ g'$. Since the former is equal to the identity $1_X$ on $X$, one has $p \circ j' \circ g' = 1_X$; since $g'$ is an isomorphism, $p$ is thus an isomorphism on $A'$. Considered as a map of the underlying topological spaces, $g : X \to A$ is clearly surjective (and hence a homeomorphism) since $A = g(X)$. Consider the homeomorphisms $u = g' \circ g^{-1} : A \to A'$ and $v = g \circ g'^{-1} : A' \to A$ of the underlying spaces of $A$ and $A$'; since $j \circ v = j \circ g \circ g'^{-1} = j' \circ g' \circ g'^{-1} = j'$ and similarly $j' \circ u = j$, one obtains an equality $A = A'$ of the underlying spaces of $A$ and $A'$. Since $A'$ is isomorphic as a scheme to the reduced scheme $X$, and $A$ is by definition the unique reduced subscheme of $X \times_S Y$ having $A$ as its underlying space, it follows that $A$ and $A'$ are indeed the same subscheme of $X \times_S Y$. Finally, one sees that $p \circ j = p \circ j'$ is an isomorphism from $A = A'$ to $X$.

share|improve this answer
By considering the morphism $v' : A' \to A$ which is the composite of $g'^{-1}$ and $g$, you can prove $j' = j \circ v$, where $j$ and $j'$ are the inclusions of $A$ and $A'$ into $X \times_S Y$, respectively. This shows $A' \subset A$. –  Adeel Khan Feb 26 '13 at 17:19
I don't see it, sorry. Could you provide more please? –  Heidar Svan Feb 26 '13 at 20:34
I just added the rest of the proof. Hope it's correct. Nice problem! –  Adeel Khan Feb 27 '13 at 1:04
I believe it works! Thank you. However, couldn't one argue more directly by saying that A and X are both reduced closed subschemes of $(X \times_Y )_{red}$? –  Heidar Svan Feb 27 '13 at 12:39
I'm not sure that I follow, how is this different from my argument? –  Adeel Khan Feb 27 '13 at 14:18

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.