Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Are any two open, connected subsets of $\Bbb{R}^n$ homeomorphic? This seems intuitively true.

share|improve this question
    
    
Think about donuts and disks. –  Neal Feb 25 '13 at 18:53
add comment

3 Answers

1 $\neq$ 0 $\neq$ 8

(Think of these as being open subsets of the plane. The set consists of the area that is colored black. Remove the infinitely thin boundary)

share|improve this answer
    
I am not sure how to think of these as open subsets of the plane? Certainly not 1... –  Zev Chonoles Feb 25 '13 at 17:58
    
This is a bit mysterious to me. I see $0$, but $1$ and $8$... –  1015 Feb 25 '13 at 17:59
    
I think the idea is that you should draw the symbols in the plane, and then take small open neighbourhoods of them. –  Matt Pressland Feb 25 '13 at 17:59
1  
The set consists of the area that is colored black. Remove the infinitely thin boundary. –  Rasmus Feb 25 '13 at 18:00
5  
I guess the point would come across better in bold font: 1, 0, 8. –  user53153 Feb 25 '13 at 18:06
show 3 more comments

Nope ! For example $\rm B(0, 2)$ is not homeomorphic to $\rm B(0,2) \backslash \rm \overline{B(0,1)}$.

share|improve this answer
    
If the statement was refined to say: any two open, simply-connected subsets of $\mathbb{R}^n$, would the statement then be true? –  user54147 Feb 25 '13 at 18:00
3  
@Lev: It certainly would not be true for $n>2$ because these spaces are simply-connected in that case. –  Zev Chonoles Feb 25 '13 at 18:01
1  
@LevLivnev: in higher dimensions one should then replace simply connected with "n-connected." –  Rasmus Feb 25 '13 at 18:40
1  
@LevLivnev the idea holds when you define higher dimensional analogues to "simply connected". The idea behind these examples is the fact that the fundamental groups of these spaces are non-isomorphic, the fundamental groups $\pi_n$ detect $n$-dimensional holes. I have no idea to justify this without using these concepts. Has anyone other explanation? –  Vinicius M. Feb 25 '13 at 18:45
1  
@ViniciusM. There are contractible open manifolds that are not homeomorphic to Euclidean space, for example: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitehead_manifold Does this answer your question? –  MartianInvader Feb 25 '13 at 23:30
show 1 more comment

When $n>1$, an open annulus $$\{x\in\mathbb{R}^n\mid a<|x|<b\},\quad 0<a<b$$ and an open ball $$\{x\in\mathbb{R}^n\mid |x|<r\},\quad 0<r$$ are open connected subsets of $\mathbb{R}^n$ that are not homeomorphic.

When $n=1$ or $0$, it is true that any open connected subsets of $\mathbb{R}^n$ are homeomorphic. This is because any open connected subset of $\mathbb{R}$ is an open interval, and $\mathbb{R}^0$ is just a point.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.