Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

$f(x)$ is Riemann integrable on $I=[a,b]$ and $f(x)>0$ for all $x \in I$, prove $\int_a^b f(x) dx >0$ .

Need help on this question, please help me

share|cite|improve this question

closed as off-topic by Did, Daniel W. Farlow, anomaly, N. F. Taussig, Meta Mar 9 '15 at 1:51

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Did, Daniel W. Farlow, anomaly, N. F. Taussig, Meta
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

up vote -1 down vote accepted

Ok, so I hope that you know that (with obvious meaning of notation) (all depending on your definition of the integral) $$ \int_a^b f(x)\; dx \geq \sum_{i}[\inf_{[x_i, x_{i+1}]} f(x)]\Delta x $$ for all partitions of $[a,b]$, where $\inf$ is the infimum of $f$ over each subinterval.

Now the claim is that there is a $\delta >0$ and a subinterval $[x_1 , x_{i+1}]$ such that $f(x) \geq \delta$ on that interval. Suppose this wasn't true. Then $$ \sum_{i}[\inf_{[x_i, x_{i+1}]} f(x)]\Delta x = 0 $$ for all pertitions. And so (taking the limit) the integral would be $0$.

So there is an interval $[x_i, x_{i+1}]$ and a $\delta > 0$ such that $f(x)\geq \delta$ for all $x\in [x_i, x_{i+1}]$.

So now you have that $f(x)\geq \delta >0$ on an interval $[x_i , x_{i+1}]$. So then $$ \int_{x_i}^{x_{i+1}} f(x)\; dx \geq \delta(x_{i+1} - x_i) > 0. $$ So $$ \int_{a}^b f(x)\; dx = \int_a^{x_i} f(x)\; dx + \int_{x_i}^{x_{i+1}} f(x)\; dx + \int_{x_{i+1}}^b f(x)\; dx > 0. $$ (Assuming that you are fine with saying that the first and last integral definitely are greater then or equal to $0$).

share|cite|improve this answer
This answer proves that if the integral of f on I is positive then there exists a nondegenerate interval J and some positive δ such that f⩾δ on J, and that if there exists a nondegenerate interval J and some positive δ such that f⩾δ on J then the integral of f on I is positive. These implications are true but they do not solve the question. Better? – Did Mar 9 '15 at 19:23

The integral is at least as big as any lower sum that you compute. Show that every lower sum is greater than zero.

share|cite|improve this answer
but we need inf f(x) to compute lower sum.Since inf f(x) could be 0, so could lower sum. – user63219 Feb 24 '13 at 23:41
"Show that every lower sum is greater than zero." Not true. – Did Mar 8 '15 at 15:08

If $f$ is Riemann integrable on $[a,b]$, then there is a point $c\in [a,b]$ such that $f$ is continuous at $c$ (in fact, $f$ is continuous almost everywhere in $[a,b]\,$). Since $f(c)>0$, it follows that there is a non-degenerate interval $I\subset[a,b]$ and a positive number $\alpha$ such that $f(x)\ge \alpha$ for all $x\in I$. We then have, by the nonnegativity of $f$, that $\int_a^b f(x)\,dx\ge \int_{I} f(x)\,dx>0$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.