Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

i) Show that the intervals $(a, \infty)$, $a \in (0, \infty)$ together with $\emptyset$ and $[0, \infty)$ form a topology on $[0, \infty)$.

ii) Show that in this topology $[0, \infty)$ is compact. Show that for each $a \in [0, \infty)$, the subspace $[a, \infty)$ is also compact.

iii) Notice that intersection $\bigcap_{k=1}^\infty [k,\infty)= \emptyset$,why doesn’t this contradict the statement that “the intersection of a decreasing sequence of nonempty compact sets is nonempty.”

this is not homework, it is from a book with no solutions.

i is easy from definition and checking union and intersection.

share|improve this question
    
What topology are you working with? If you are working in the Euclidean metric space, then $[0, \infty)$ is not compact since it is not bounded. –  David Toth Feb 24 '13 at 17:22
    
He is defining the topology. –  copper.hat Feb 24 '13 at 17:23
2  
Please use actual words, not "defn, soln" and so on. –  Asaf Karagila Feb 24 '13 at 17:37
    
Your topology is known as the right order topology: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… –  Seirios Feb 24 '13 at 18:27

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

i) is straightforward.

For ii), note that if $\cal O$ is an open cover of $[a,\infty)$, then at least one element of $\cal O$ must contain the point $a$. If $a=0$, then the only set satisfying this is $[0,\infty)$, and if $a>0$, then there must exists a set of the form $[b,\infty) \in {\cal O}$ where $b < a$ (otherwise $\cup_{U \in {\cal O}} U = (a, \infty)$). Hence there exists a finite cover.

For iii), the statement should be in terms of closed, not compact sets. In this particular topology, the only non-empty compact sets that is closed is $[0,\infty)$.

share|improve this answer
    
Just to add a little bit. This kind of problem (I'm refering to iii)) happens when the space is not Hausdorff. –  Tomás Feb 24 '13 at 17:39
    
@Tomás: Good point. Without textbook at hand I forget the various separation axioms... –  copper.hat Feb 24 '13 at 18:03

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.