# Strictly formal proof of $\displaystyle \lim_{x \to 0} \frac{\sin(x)}{x} = 1$.

I’m looking for a proof of $\displaystyle \lim_{x \to 0} \frac{\sin(x)}{x} = 1$ that does not use other trigonometric functions or any first-order approximation to the sine function. Is this possible? The other proofs that I’ve seen on this website don’t really fit these stringent requirements, so I was hoping to see a different kind of demonstration altogether. Thanks!!

-
The limit should read $\displaystyle \lim_{x \to 0} \frac{\sin(x)}{x} = 1$. – Haskell Curry Feb 23 '13 at 20:37
What definition of sin(x) are you taking here? – anonymous Feb 23 '13 at 20:39
Oh, so you don't want to use $\tan$ and $\cos$, for instance...Otherwise, this would do: proofwiki.org/wiki/Limit_of_Sine_of_X_over_X/Geometric_Proof – 1015 Feb 23 '13 at 20:39
@Azmoti: It’s not an exact duplicate because the OP seems to want to avoid Taylor series. :) – Haskell Curry Feb 23 '13 at 20:43
A functional approach is taken in "A New Approach to Circular Functions, II and lim (sin x)/x" by Gerson B. Robison in Mathematics Magazine, Vol. 41, No. 2 (Mar., 1968), pp. 66-70 – Byron Schmuland Feb 23 '13 at 20:51

An interesting proof that sees no trigonometry or Maclaurin series until the very final conclusion (at the cost of doing Riemann integration):

Define a function $\theta: [-1,1] \to \mathbb{R}$ as follows: $$\forall a \in [-1,1]: \quad \theta(a) \stackrel{\text{def}}{=} \int_{0}^{a} \sqrt{1 - x^{2}} ~ d{x}.$$ For each $a \in [-1,1]$, we can interpret $\theta(a)$ as the signed arc-length of the parametrized curve $$\left\{ \left( x,\sqrt{1 - x^{2}} \right) \in \mathbb{S}^{1} ~ \Big| ~ \text{ x  is between  0  and  a } \right\}.$$

Observe that $\theta$ has the following properties:

• $\theta(0) = 0$ and

• $\theta: [-1,1] \to \mathbb{R}$ is a strictly increasing continuous function.

There is thus an inverse function $\theta^{-1}: \text{Range}(\theta) \to [-1,1]$, and we define the sine function (or at least part of it) by

$$\sin \stackrel{\text{def}}{=} \theta^{-1}.$$

Hence, \begin{align} \lim_{a \to 0} \frac{\sin(\theta(a))}{\theta(a)} &= \lim_{a \to 0} \frac{{\theta^{-1}}(\theta(a))}{\theta(a)} \\ &= \lim_{a \to 0} \frac{a}{\theta(a)} \\ &= \lim_{a \to 0} \frac{a}{\displaystyle \int_{0}^{a} \sqrt{1 - x^{2}} ~ d{x}} \quad (\text{By definition.}) \\ &= \lim_{a \to 0} \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - a^{2}}} \quad (\text{By l’Hôpital’s Rule.}) \\ &= 1. \end{align} Therefore, $$\lim_{\theta \to 0} \frac{\sin(\theta)}{\theta} = 1.$$

-
Cannot l’Hôpital’s Rule be used directly on $\sin(x)/x$? – enzotib Feb 23 '13 at 20:54
@enzotib: If you use l’Hôpital’s Rule on $\sin$, you get $\cos$, which the OP wants to avoid. :) – Haskell Curry Feb 23 '13 at 20:55
@enzotib, We aren't allowed to use l’Hôpital’s Rule because that would assume that $\frac{d}{dx} \sin x = \cos x$. However, that result follows from $\lim_{x\to 0} \frac{\sin x}{x} = 1$, so by assuming $\sin\prime = \cos$, we are assuming the limit we want to prove. – George V. Williams Feb 23 '13 at 20:56
Not necessarily. We typically take the definition of sin(x) as a power series. From this definition, it's straightforward to prove that sin'(x) = cos(x) without proving that sin(x)/x tends to 1. – anonymous Feb 23 '13 at 21:46
@anonymous, you cannot take sine as a power series without first knowing the derivative of sine. – CogitoErgoCogitoSum Feb 24 '13 at 1:22

Taking the definition $$\sin(x)=\frac{1}{2i} (e^{ix} - e^{-ix})$$

Than you get from the exponentialfunction the identity $$\sin(x)=\sum_{k=0}^\infty (-1)^n \frac{x^{2n+1}}{(2n+1)!}=x-\frac{x^3}{3!}+\frac{x^5}{5!}\mp \cdots$$

So we have $$\lim_{x\rightarrow 0 } \frac{\sin(x)}{x}=\lim_{x\rightarrow 0} 1-\frac{x^2}{3!} + \frac{x^4}{5!}\mp \cdots=1$$

Else you could define $$\sin(x)=x\prod_{k=1}^\infty \left(1-\frac{x^2}{k^2 \pi^2 } \right)$$ Than $$\lim_{x\rightarrow 0 } \frac{\sin(x)}{x} =\lim_{x\rightarrow 0} \prod_{k=1}^\infty \left(1-\frac{x^2}{k^2\pi^2}\right)$$

-
I think you could, instead of expanding the exponential function, directly take the limit of $e^{ix}/x$, with the aid of L'Hôpital. – awllower Feb 24 '13 at 3:43

If you're not defining $\sin$ via Taylor series, the obvious other rigorous alternative would be to define it (near $0$) as the inverse function of $\arcsin$, where we take $\arcsin y = \int_0^y \frac{dt}{\sqrt{1-t^2}}$. Then

\begin{eqnarray} \int_0^y \frac{dt}{\sqrt{1-t^2}} &<& \int_0^y \frac{dt}{\sqrt{1-y^2}} = \frac{y}{\sqrt{1-y^2}} \\ \int_0^y \frac{dt}{\sqrt{1-t^2}} &>& \int_0^y \, dt = y \end{eqnarray}

So $\sqrt{1-y^2}<\frac{y}{\arcsin y}<1$, and thus $\lim_{y \to 0} \frac{y}{\arcsin y} =1$ by the squeeze theorem.

After making the change of variables $x=\arcsin y$ in this last limit (justified because $\arcsin y$ is continuous and monotone), it follows that $\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{\sin x}{x}=1$.

-
why it is so obvious that your function is injective ? – Dominic Michaelis Feb 23 '13 at 21:09
@DominicMichaelis: It's the integral of something positive. – Micah Feb 23 '13 at 21:10

I'm assuming that OP uses the geometric (slightly non-rigorous) definition of the trigonometric functions, i.e., $(\cos(t),\sin(t))$ is the point on the unit circle forming angle $t$ with the positive $X$ axis).

The requested limit (known as the first fundamental limit) can't be computed by any method that relies on the fact that $\sin'(x)=\cos(x)$ (in fact, this limit is required in the proof of that fact), and I think this is the point of this exercise. Here is a geometric proof, legitimate along these lines.

-
You just hit the nail on the head, Ittay. However, if we can give a formal definition of ‘angle’, then the problem of semi-rigor is solved. One can define ‘angle’ using arc-length, which is what I did above, but of course, I needed to resort to Riemann integration. – Haskell Curry Feb 24 '13 at 3:54
and you just drove the nail all the way into the wood @HaskellCurry :) – Ittay Weiss Feb 24 '13 at 4:03