Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I get back to a question I post long time ago, because that is quite important to me...

Let $\mathbb{X} = \{a, b, c...\}$ be a finite set, $\mathbb{N}$ refers to the set of all natural numbers. I have defined a function $\rho \in \mathbb{X} \rightarrow \mathbb{N} = \mathbb{N}^\mathbb{X}$.

Now I am looking for a function to extend the domain of $\rho$: adding 2 variables to it. For instance, adding $\alpha \mapsto 2$ and $\beta \mapsto 3$ to $\rho$, to make a new function $\rho': \mathbb{X} \cup \{\alpha, \beta\} \rightarrow \mathbb{N}$, such that $\rho'(\alpha) = 2, \rho'(\beta) = 3 \wedge \forall x \in \mathbb{X}, \rho(x) = \rho'(x)$

I really would like to write it in an elegent way, becase I use it very often. Some suggest to write $\rho' = \rho \times [\alpha \mapsto 2, \beta \mapsto 3]$, some suggest $\rho' = \rho \wedge (\alpha \mapsto 2, \beta \mapsto 3)$. I don't find them perfect. Isn't there a conventional way to write it?

Could anyone help?

share|improve this question
    
The straightforward answer is that $\rho'=\rho\cup\{\langle\alpha,2\rangle,\langle\beta,3\rangle\}$. This isn’t as readable as a by-case definition, though. –  Brian M. Scott Feb 23 '13 at 22:59
add comment

1 Answer

I find your arrow notation to be quite difficult to read.

If $\alpha,\beta\notin\Bbb X$ then we can fix $f\in\Bbb N^{\alpha,\beta}$ (in our case $f(\alpha)=2, f(\beta)=3$), and define the following map from $\Bbb{N^X}$ to $\Bbb{N^{X\cup\{\alpha,\beta\}}}$ defined by: $$\rho\mapsto\rho\cup f$$

We can define this as $\rho'$ or $\rho_f$ if you want to consider some other $f$ (or allow it to somewhat vary).

To the particular case here, you can always give the following line:

For $\rho\in\Bbb{N^X}$ we denote $\rho'$ the extension of the function $\rho$ to the domain $\Bbb X\cup\{\alpha,\beta\}$, such that $$\rho'(x) = \begin{cases}\rho(x) & x\in\Bbb X\\ 2& x=\alpha\\ 3& x=\beta\end{cases}$$

Using too many mathematical symbols obfuscates meaning and introduces difficulty for the reader to follow your work. Remember that mathematics is a language, and it has many "sublanguages" in the form of mathematical notation. Learning new notations is equal to learning a new language, and if the reader is not very familiar with the notation it becomes great pain to translate the written to a language the reader is familiar with.

share|improve this answer
    
I understand your comment, but I don't need to write it in general, what I am really looking for, is a way to write this special case in short: for instance, $\rho' = \rho \times [\alpha \mapsto 2, \beta \mapsto 3]$ that unfortunately I don't find perfect... –  SoftTimur Feb 23 '13 at 17:39
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.