Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I think I understand these concepts ok:

But there seems to be a layer that I miss: They all seem to be connected, alas I don't know how exactly. In a way you should be able to transform one into the other?!?

Could anyone please enlighten me? Thank you!

share|improve this question
    
See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… –  lhf Apr 5 '11 at 13:00
    
@lhf: Thank you, I found that already - I think it gives only part of the answer and not the big picture. –  vonjd Apr 5 '11 at 13:02
add comment

1 Answer 1

up vote 12 down vote accepted

The Chain Rule and $u$-substitution are "inverses of each other." In the Chain Rule, you obtain the derivative of a composition: $$\Bigl(f(g(x))\Bigr)' = f'(g(x))g'(x).$$

In $u$-substitution, you "recognize" a product of two functions $h(x)g(x)$ as an instance of $f'(g(x))g'(x)$ by doing a substitution. So $$\frac{2x}{x^2+1} = \frac{1}{x^2+1}(2x)$$ is "recognized" as $f'(g(x))g'(x)$ by taking $g(x) = x^2+1$, which makes $f'(u) = \frac{1}{u}$.

That is, the connection between the Chain Rule and $u$-substitution is completely and absolutely direct; one "undoes" what the other one does. The $u$-substitution simplifies the result of the Chain Rule to make integration "more obvious", calling $g(x)=u$ and $g'(x)\,dx = du$, so that instead of $f'(g(x))g'(x)\,dx$ you have $f'(u)\,du$.

The connection with Riemann-Stieltjes integral is rather more tenuous. Remember that the Riemann-Stieltjes integral of $f(x)$ with respect to $g(x)$, $$\int_a^b f(x)dg(x)$$ is defined to be the limit over partitions $P$ of $[a,b]$ as the mesh size goes to zero of the Riemann-Stieltjes sum $$S(P,f,g) = \sum_{i=0}^{n-1} f(x_i^*)(g(x_{i+1})-g(x_i)),$$ where $x_i^*$ is an arbitrary point in the partition interval $[x_i,x_{i+1}]$.

When $g$ is differentiable, the Mean Value Theorem tells us that there exists $x'_i$ in each $(x_i,x_{i+1})$ such that $g'(x'_i)(x_{i+1}-x_i) = g(x_{i+1})-g(x_i)$, so that we can replace the Riemann-Stieltjes sum (by switching, if necessary, the point $x_i^*$ of evaluation of $f$ to the same point $x'_i$) with: $$\sum_{i=0}^{n-1} f(x'_i)g'(x'_i)(x_{i+1}-x_i)$$ which is a Riemann sum for the function $h(x)=f(x)g'(x)$. Therefore, taking the limit over the partitions $P$ of $[a,b]$ as the mesh size goes to zero of this Riemann sum gives the integral of $h(x)$, and so you get the equality

$$\begin{align*} \int_a^b f(x)\,dg(x) &= \lim_{||P||\to 0} \sum_{i=0}^{n-1}f(x_i^*)(g(x_{i+1})-g(x_i))\\ & = \lim_{||P||\to 0}\sum_{i=0}^{n-1}f(x'_i)g'(x'_i)(x_{i+1}-x_i) = \int_a^b f(x)g'(x)\,dx.\end{align*}$$

The integral on the right is similar, but not equal, to what you get with the Chain Rule; in the Chain Rule you would have $f(g(x))g'(x)$, rather than $f(x)g'(x)$. Instead, it's more like "half of a product rule" ( $(fg)' = fg' + f'g$, so here you have that first summand but not the second). So while the Riemann-Stieltjes integral looks somewhat like the Chain Rule (when $g(x)$ is differentiable), it's not quite the same.

Of course, it's possible that when you do some Riemann-Stieltjes integrals, particularly in a classroom setting, the choices of $f$ and $g$ will be precisely such that the simplified integral $\int f(x)g'(x)\,dx$ just happens to be doable with a $u$-substitution; e.g., it "just happens" that $f(x)g'(x) = \mathcal{F}'(h(x))h'(x)$ for a function $h(x)$ that has the same derivative as $g(x)$, and a function $\mathcal{F}$ that has derivative similar to $f$. For instance, if $f(x) = \frac{1}{1+x^2}$, $g(x) = x^2$, $h(x)=1+x^2$ (note that $g'(x)=h'(x)$) and $\mathcal{F}'(x) = \frac{1}{x}$, we get that $$f(x)g'(x) = \frac{1}{1+x^2}(x^2)' = \frac{1}{1+x^2}(1+x^2)' = \mathcal{F}'(h(x))h'(x) = \Bigl(\mathcal{F}(h(x))\Bigr)'$$ where $\mathcal{F}(x) = \ln|x|+C$ (since $\mathcal{F}'(x) = \frac{1}{x}$).

So doing a lot of Riemann-Stieltjes integration problems where the choices are selected to make this happen may give the illusion that Riemann-Stieltjes integration is also connected to the Chain Rule/$u$-substitution, but that is likely to be an artifact of the problems you are asked to solve, rather than a direct connection between them.

share|improve this answer
1  
+1: for a detailed and interesting answer. –  Fabian Apr 5 '11 at 16:20
    
Thank you for this very enlightening answer! –  vonjd Apr 5 '11 at 18:31
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.