Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I want to prove or disprove the following:

For any $x_1,y_1,x_2,y_2\in \mathbb{R}$ such that

$$ a \leq x_1 \leq b, \qquad c \leq y_1 \leq d$$ $$ a \leq x_2 \leq b, \qquad c \leq y_2 \leq d$$

when $a,b,c,d$ are constants, and for any $w\in[0,1]$, there exist $x_3,y_3$ such that

$$ a \leq x_3 \leq b, \qquad c \leq y_3 \leq d$$ $$ w(1+x_1)e^{-y_1} + (1-w)(1+x_2)e^{-y_2} = (1+x_3)e^{-y_3} $$

It seems true to me, but I can't prove formally. How can I do this? It is in fact to prove/disprove a set drawn by a function $(1+x)e^{-y}$ is convex or not.

share|cite|improve this question

The map $[a,b]\times [c,d]\to\mathbb R$, $(x,y)\mapsto (1+x)e^{-y}$ is continuous, hence the image of the connected set $[a,b]\times [c,d]$ is connected. Every connected subset of $\mathbb R$ is convex (is in fact an interval).

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.