Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I have some problems in acting with this operator algebrically. If I define: $$\boldsymbol p(\boldsymbol x)\in \mathbb R^3 \ \ ,\ \ P_{\alpha\beta}:=\delta_{\alpha\beta}-p_\alpha p_\beta$$ how does it affect for instance this kind of terms?

$$\boldsymbol{p}\cdot\nabla\boldsymbol{p}\ \\ \nabla^2\boldsymbol{p}\\ \boldsymbol{p}(\nabla\cdot\boldsymbol{p})$$

share|improve this question
    
Sorry, can you clarify the domains and how should we consider this $\boldsymbol{p}$? Is it a variable? Is it the argument of $P$? I assume $\boldsymbol{p}\in\Bbb R^n$ is a culomn vector. How do you exactly mean the $P$ operator? Is its matrix $I-\boldsymbol{p}^T\cdot\boldsymbol{p}$, or does $P$ act on the tensor space? –  Berci Feb 21 '13 at 12:52
1  
Yes, I need to be clearer. $\boldsymbol{p}$ is a column vector of $\mathbb R^3$, function of $\boldsymbol{x}$, respect to which the differentiation in $\nabla$ is carried. The $P$ operator is exactly the matrix $P_{\alpha\beta}=\delta_{\alpha\beta}-p_\alpha p_\beta$ –  usumdelphini Feb 21 '13 at 12:57
    
Yes, now it's much clearer.. and how do you mean 'How does it affect' the listed terms? Do you mean $P{\boldsymbol p}\cdot \nabla(P{\boldsymbol p})$? –  Berci Feb 21 '13 at 15:57
    
No, I simply meant the application of $P$ to those terms: $P(\boldsymbol{p}\cdot\nabla\boldsymbol{p})$ –  usumdelphini Feb 21 '13 at 16:02
    
But isn't the latter one a scalar? How do you 'plug it' into a matrix? –  Berci Feb 21 '13 at 16:51

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.