Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm trying to get my head around the Lie algebra of the Lorentz group once and for all, but have got tied up in knots. Where is my error in the following?

The universal covering group of the Lorentz group is $SL(2,\mathbb{C})$. Therefore the Lie algebra of the Lorentz group is $\frak{sl}(2,\mathbb{C})$, a real Lie algebra of dimension 6. Its complexification is again $\frak{sl}(2,\mathbb{C})$, since that's already a complex Lie algebra!

The problem is this doesn't agree with Wikipedia here which suggests that the complexification of the Lie algebra of the Lorentz group is $\frak{sl}(2,\mathbb{C})\oplus \frak{sl}(2,\mathbb{C})$.

Where do they get this extra term from and/or why am I missing it? Apologies if it's something obvious - it's been a long day and is nearly midnight here!

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

In your second paragraph, you are viewing $SL(2,\mathbb C)$ as a real Lie group. Its Lie algebra is $\mathfrak{sl}_2(\mathbb C)$ viewed as a real Lie algebra. The complexification is therefore $\mathfrak{sl}_2(\mathbb C)\otimes_{\mathbb R}\mathbb C$. This is not the complex Lie algebra $\mathfrak{sl}_2(\mathbb C)$: for one thing, its dimension is $6$ while the latter has dimension $3$.

Now, if $g$ is a complex Lie algebra and we let $g_{\mathbb R}$ be $g$ viewed as a real Lie algebra, wwe always have that the complexification of $g_{\mathbb R}$ is $g\oplus g$. Proving this is an instructive exercise.

share|improve this answer
    
Ah right - cheers. I see my mistake now! –  Edward Hughes Feb 20 '13 at 0:14

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.