Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Suppose that $f(x) > 0$ for all $x$, and that $f$ is decreasing. Prove that there is a continuous decreasing function $g$ such that $0 < g(x) \le f(x)$ for all $x$.

To be quite honest, I have no idea how to approach this problem. (I also have no clue about the second part, but I imagine a hint at this solution will help me along for part b.)

I thought about setting $g(x) = f(x + k)$ for some $k > 0$, but I don't know how to get continuity. I should also note that this is in the "Inverse Functions" chapter, so that must play some sort of role here, but I'm not sure how really.

Any hint at how to think about the problem, specifically about the "continuous" part of it would be much appreciated. Thanks.

share|cite|improve this question
just in case yoyo's answer is not helpful, the way to think about this is as follows: worst case, $f$ has jump discontinuities which jump downwards. Now convince yourself that we can construct a piecewise linear continuous function beneath $f$. There are still some technical things: for example, how do we know that $f$ is piecewise continuous on intervals? How bad could it be? – Glen Wheeler Apr 5 '11 at 5:56
up vote 8 down vote accepted

define $g$ to be piecewise linear with $g(n)=f(n+1)$

share|cite|improve this answer
ah ok, that's neat. – Arpon Apr 4 '11 at 2:12

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.