Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I was doing some exercises on the definitions of epics, monos, split monos, etc..., and I asked myself that if you could take, for instance an epi which is mono, and then deduce it is an iso, which is of course false; trying to recover the fact that in $Set$ epi and mono imply iso. So I wanna ask, if mono and coequalizer imply iso, or mono and split epi imply iso, or if both are false. I just wondered, since both coequalizer and split epi are stronger than epi; I've tried to show either, with no success.

Thanks

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 7 down vote accepted

If $f$ is a coequalizer of maps $g, h$ then $fg = fh$. If $f$ is also mono then $g = h$. The coequalizer of the pair $(g, g)$ is the identity map which is indeed an isomorphism. So mono + coequalizer does mean isomorphism.

For mono and split epi assume $fg = \mathrm{id}$. Then $fgf = f$ so if $f$ is mono $gf = \mathrm{id}$, hence $f$ is iso. Alternatively, observe that $f$ is a coequalizer for $(gf, \mathrm{id})$.

The same holds for epi + equalizer and epi + split mono.

share|improve this answer
    
in the first paragraph I don't understand why $f$ is an iso –  rush fan Feb 17 '13 at 22:52
1  
Coequalizer is defined via a universal property, so when it exists it is unique up to isomorphism, hence $f$ is isomorphic to the identity map because they are both coequalizers of the pair $(g, g)$. Being isomorphic to the identity map implies that you are yourself an isomorphism. –  Jim Feb 17 '13 at 22:57
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.