Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $X\subset\mathbb{P}^n$ and $Y\subset\mathbb{P}^m$ be projective varieties. If $m$ homogeneous polynomials in $n+1$ variables of the same degree give a partially defined map from $X$ to $Y$ then this map is called a rational map.

My question is why do some people insist in the definition of a rational map that $X$ be irreducible?

share|cite|improve this question

Irreducible varieties have a function fields (the stalk at the generic point in scheme language), and it is a useful fact that rational maps correspond 1:1 to homomorphisms between the function fields. But of course the definition of a rational map doesn't require any assumption, and in fact, works for arbitrary varieties/schemes. A quite general treatment can be found in the Stacks Project, 24.10.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.