Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $T:V_3\to V_3 $ be a linear transformation such that


(both bases are usual unit coordinate vectors)

Now choose both bases to be $(e_1,e_2,e_3)$ where $e_1=(2,3,5)$, $e_2=(1,0,0)$, $e_3=(0,1,-1)$

Determine the matrix of T reative to the new bases.

My book says, that to determine the matrix of T relative to choice of bases, I need to transform each basis element of the first space and express it as a linear combination of the basis element of the second space. First of all, I express the transformation as follows:


Then for example $T(e_1)=-e_1+e_2-e_3=(-1,-4,-4)$ (right?)

Then I should express it a combination of $e_1,e_2,e_3$. If I do that, if I understand it correctly, I shuould get the first column of the matrix. However, the first column of the matrix has corresponding vaues of $2,1,2$ (I know this from the answers) and obviously something is wrong with my solution as these numbers does not correspond to the combination I am supposed to find.

I missunderstood something and looking forward to hints of how should I find the matrix to the new chosen bases. Thank you!

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 0 down vote accepted

It seems to be you're mixing physics and mathematics notations: as I see it, you mean


so your transformation says:


As you can see, your transformation maps

$$\left\{\begin{pmatrix}0\\0\\1\end{pmatrix}\;,\;\;\begin{pmatrix}0\\1\\1\end{pmatrix}\;,\;\;\begin{pmatrix}1\\1\\1\end{pmatrix}\right\}\stackrel T\longrightarrow\left\{\begin{pmatrix}2\\3\\5\end{pmatrix}\;,\;\;\begin{pmatrix}1\\0\\0\end{pmatrix}\;,\;\;\begin{pmatrix}\;0\\\;1\\\!\!-1\end{pmatrix}\right\}$$

share|cite|improve this answer
It would be nice if the downvoter could explain what she/he sees wrong in my answer-hint. Maybe I can fix... – DonAntonio Feb 16 '13 at 18:40
I think it does as it seems the OP missed the fact, if I translated correctly his notation, that the "new" basis vectors are the images of the old one... – DonAntonio Feb 16 '13 at 18:47
Ok, yes, you're right, it is clearer like that and the OP probably missed this fact. – 1015 Feb 16 '13 at 18:51
In fact, it is my opinion that the hint is almost the whole answer, but of course: it may still be possible that my interpretation of $\,i,j,k\,$ is wrong, though it is the usual one in physics. Anyway, some people really rushes to downvote and even if someone's answer's wrong that is, I think, against the spirit of the site. Oh, well....:) – DonAntonio Feb 16 '13 at 18:56
Almost, yes. Maybe you can add a few words to explain how to compute the matrix in the new basis. – 1015 Feb 16 '13 at 18:59

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.