Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am trying to understand a proof for critical points of certain energy functions being harmonic functions. It goes as follows: For a function $u(x_1,..,x_n)$, a functional E(u) is defined as

$E(u) = \frac{1}{2}\int |\nabla u|^2 $

For the proof, a curve is constructed in the space of functions by using $u+t\phi$. Restricting the energy functional to this curve gives:

$E(u+t\phi) = \frac{1}{2} \int | \nabla (u+t\phi)|^2 = \frac{1}{2} \int |\nabla u|^2 + t \int \langle u,\nabla \phi \rangle + \frac{t^2}{2} \int |\nabla \phi|^2 $

Then differentiating at $t=0$

$\frac{d}{dt_{t=0}}E(u+t\phi) = \int \langle\nabla u, \nabla \phi\rangle = - \int \phi \triangle u$

The proof then states that the last equality is due to divergence theorem which I know is

$\int \int_S F \cdot n d\sigma = \int \int \int \nabla \cdot F dV$

I do not understand the connection between divergence theorem and how it is used in this proof. Any help?

Link:

http://arxiv.org/pdf/1102.1411 (page 2)

share|improve this question
    
I also received this on mathoverflow from Spiro Karigiannis, I just put it here for addition "Try putting F=φ∇u into the divergence theorem. You either have no boundary or you are in the setting where the "bump" function φ can be taken to decay to zero by the time it reaches the boundary". I voted the article to be deleted from there, as it received -2 votes. I have no idea why. :) –  BB_ML Apr 2 '11 at 13:10
1  
It's a very basic and known method in the calculus of variations. MathOverflow is not suitable for this type of question, that's why it was downvoted. But it's certainly welcome here. :-) –  Greg Graviton Apr 2 '11 at 13:21
    
ok, good to know. thanks. –  BB_ML Apr 2 '11 at 13:38
add comment

2 Answers

up vote 2 down vote accepted

The identity

$$ \int_V d\vec x\, \langle \nabla \phi, \nabla u \rangle = -\int_V d\vec x\ \phi\Delta u $$

is a consequence of integration by parts and the divergence theorem. Namely, we have

$$ \langle \nabla \phi, \nabla u \rangle = \sum_i \partial_i\phi\,\partial_i u = \sum_i \left(\partial_i (\phi\,\partial_i u) - \phi\,\partial_i^2 u\right) = \nabla\cdot(\phi\nabla u) - \phi\Delta u$$

Hence, integrating over the volume gives

$$ \int_V d\vec x\,\langle \nabla \phi, \nabla u \rangle = \int_V d\vec x\,(\nabla\cdot(\phi\nabla u) - \phi\Delta u) = \int_{\partial V} d\vec n\cdot \phi\nabla u - \int_V d\vec x\ \phi\Delta u .$$

Since the variation $\phi$ is assumed to vanish on the boundary $\partial V$, the surface integral vanishes.


This trick of "shifting the derivatives of $\phi$ to $u$" is extremely common in the calculus of variations. I suggest that you absorb it by doing several exercises. For instance, I recommend to derive the Euler-Lagrange equations for a general functional

$$ S[u] := \int_V d\vec x\ \mathcal L(u,\partial_i u) .$$

share|improve this answer
add comment

This is more often called Green's identity but is indeed a consequence of the divergence theorem as you know it.

To get an intuition of why this is true, one can go back to dimension $1$. Integration by parts gives $$ \int \phi' u'=[\phi u']-\int\phi u'', $$ and you recognize the LHS and the last term on the RHS. And the first term $[\phi u']$ on the RHS is zero because the functional $E:u\mapsto E(u)$ is defined on functions $u$ with a prescribed value on the boundary, and the tangent space of these is made of functions $\phi$ which are zero on the boundary. In other (simpler) words, for any $t\ne0$, both functions $u$ and $u+t\phi$ coincide with a prescribed function on the boundary if and only if $\phi=0$ on the boundary.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.