Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

The following is a modified exercise from an analysis 1 book.

Is there a function $f:\mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ with:
i) $f$ has in $0$ a strict local and global minimum.
ii) $f\in C^\infty$
iii) There is no $\varepsilon>0$ so that $f$ is monotone in $(-\varepsilon,0]$
iv) There is no $\varepsilon>0$ so that $f$ is monotone in $[0,\varepsilon)$

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 8 down vote accepted

Yeah there is a function. $$f(x)=\left\{ \begin{array}{rl} \sin^2\left(\frac{1}{x}\right) e^{-(x^{-2})}+e^{-(x^{-4})} & x\neq 0\\ 0 & x=0\\ \end{array}\right. $$ It's obvious that the function is $C^\infty$, since $e^{-(x^{-4})}$ is strictly greater $0$ and the other term is greater equal $0$, $f$ must have a strict global and local minimum in $0$.
The monotonicity thing is a bit more technical, using $$a_n=\frac{1}{2\pi n} \quad b_n=\frac{1}{2\pi n + \frac{\pi}{2} }$$ with $a_n, b_n \rightarrow 0$ and $$a_n> b_n>a_{n-1}$$ for all $n$ (where the sequences are defined).$$f(a_n)=e^{-16\pi^4 n^4}$$ and $$f(b_n)=e^{-(2 \pi n+\frac{\pi}{2})^2}+e^{-(2\pi n+ \frac{\pi}{2})^4}$$ We see $f(b_n)>f(b_{n+1})$, but $f(a_n)< f(b_n)> f(a_{n-1})$. So the function can't be monotone on $[0,\varepsilon)$

share|improve this answer
2  
asked Feb 15 at 16:46 answered Feb 15 at 16:46 Did you just made this question to share? Seems you already knew the answer to it before posting. –  Pedro Tamaroff Mar 24 '13 at 20:34
    
@PedroTamaroff jupp because I really liked it –  Dominic Michaelis Oct 14 '13 at 3:25
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.