Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

From what I can tell from the definitions of a lower-triangular, upper-triangular, and diagonal matrices, I've come to the conclusion that the zero matrix is in the set of all of each type of matrix. Is this correct?

share|cite|improve this question
    
Yes ${}{}{}{}{}{}$. – copper.hat Feb 14 '13 at 20:09
up vote 2 down vote accepted

A zero square matrix is lower triangular, upper triangular, and also diagonal.

share|cite|improve this answer

If an object meets the definition of three things then it is the three things. What are you confused about?

share|cite|improve this answer
    
The definition of those three things, for instance take the definition provided here: mathworld.wolfram.com/LowerTriangularMatrix.html I didn't find it particularly clear. The stumbling block was on could a_{ij} = 0. Apparently the answer is yes, yes it can. – BrotherJack Feb 14 '13 at 20:19

Provided it is a square matrix.

An upper triangular matrix is one in which all entries below main diagonal are zero. Clearly this is satisfied.

An lower triangular matrix is one in which all entries above main diagonal are zero. Clearly this is satisfied.

An diagonal matrix is one in which all non-diagonal entries are zero. Clearly this is also satisfied.

Hence, a zero square matrix is upper and lower triangular as well as diagonal matrix.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.