Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Given $a_1,a_2,\gamma,b_1,b_1 \in\mathbb{R}$.

Say if the Linear Least Squares problem of the following matrix has solution and if yes how many? $$ A= \begin{bmatrix} a_1 & \gamma a_1 \\ a_2 & \gamma a_1\\ \end{bmatrix} $$ $$ b= \begin{bmatrix} b_1 \\ b_2 \end{bmatrix} $$

My answer is this: "According to one of the theorems if $A \in \mathbb{C}^{m\times n}$ and its range is maximum then its linear least squares problem has one solution and it is $A^*AX= A^*b$"

Now using the above theorem I said the problem of the least linear squares of the given matrix has unique solution since $\det(A)= \gamma a_1^2-\gamma a_1a_2 \neq 0$.

Is my solution correct? or should i have semplifed the above equation?

Thank you!

share|cite|improve this question
What if $a_1=0$? What if $\gamma=0$? What if $a_1=a_2$? – Gerry Myerson Feb 14 '13 at 11:45
@GerryMyerson, Yes i should have added that condition as mentioned by Stefan Hansen below. – tutak Feb 14 '13 at 11:55
up vote 0 down vote accepted

The least squares problem has a unique solution if and only if $A$ has full rank. But since $A$ is a square matrix, then $A$ has full rank if and only if $A$ is invertible. So you're absolutely right about checking whether the determinant is non-zero. Note however, that $$ \det(A)=\gamma(a_1^2-a_1a_2) $$ is indeed $0$ in any of the following cases

  1. $\gamma=0$,
  2. $a_1=0$,
  3. $a_1=a_2$,

or any combination of these together.

share|cite|improve this answer
So i should have added that the Least Linear squares problem has a unique solution provided that $\gamma\ \neg$ 0 , $a_1 \neg$ 0 and $a_1 \neg$ a_2. right? Thank you very much for the editing and answer. – tutak Feb 14 '13 at 11:52
Yes (i take it that you meant $\neq$ three times). And you're welcome. – Stefan Hansen Feb 14 '13 at 11:56
Yes, i meant not equal :) – tutak Feb 14 '13 at 11:57

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.