Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

What is a simple way of proving strong induction implies weak induction and vice versa using simple predicate logic and quantifiers?

share|cite|improve this question

Weak induction: $$\Phi(0), \forall n\colon \Phi(n)\to\Phi(n+1)\vdash\forall n\colon \Phi(n).$$ Strong induction: $$\forall n\colon (\forall m<n\colon \Psi(m))\to\Psi(n)\vdash\forall n\colon \Psi(n)$$ (All vars implied to be in $\mathbb N_0$ for brevity).

To show that weak induction implies strong induction, one lets $\Phi(n)\equiv \forall m<n\colon \Psi(m)$ for given $\Psi$: We have $\Phi(0)$ because $\forall m<0\colon\Psi(m)$ is vacuously true. Using $m<n+1\to m<n\lor m=n$, we find that $$\forall m<n\colon \Psi(m)\implies\Psi(n)\land\forall m<n\colon \Psi(m)\implies \forall m<n+1\colon \Psi(m)$$ and thus $\forall n\colon \Phi(n)\to\Phi(n+1)$. By weak induction, $\forall n\colon \Phi(n)$. Especially, for arbitrary $n$ we find $\forall m<n\colon \Phi(m)$, i.e. $\forall n\colon\Psi(n)$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.