Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $Y_1,Y_2,...,Y_n$ denote a random sample from the probability density function $$f(y| \theta)= \begin{cases} ( \theta +1)y^{ \theta}, & 0 < y<1 , \theta> -1 \\ 0, & \mbox{elsewhere}, \end{cases}$$

Find an Estimator for $\theta$ by using the method of moments and show that it is consistent.

I have found the estimator but unsure how to show that it is consistent.

$\mathbb{E}Y=\frac{\theta +1}{\theta +2}$ and $m_1'(u)= \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^{n}Y_i= \bar Y$

Now, $$\mathbb{E}Y=\frac{ \theta +1}{ \theta +2}=m_1'(u)= \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^{n}Y_i= \bar Y$$

So $$\bar{Y}=\frac{ \theta +1}{ \theta +2} \to \hat{\theta}=\frac{2 \bar Y- 1}{1- \bar Y} $$

Now I am unsure how to show that $\hat\theta=\frac{2 \bar Y- 1}{1- \bar Y}$ is a consistent estimator for $\theta$

Can someone please guide me?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

The sequence of estimators $(\hat\theta_n)_n$ is consistent if $\hat\theta_n\to\theta$ in probability with respect to $\mathbb P_\theta$, for every $\theta$. Here, the strong law of large numbers for i.i.d. sequences of integrable random variables implies that $\bar Y_n\to\mathbb E_\theta(Y)=(\theta+1)/(\theta+2)$ almost surely with respect to $\mathbb P_\theta$, hence $\bar Y_n\ne1$ for every $n$ large enough, almost surely, and $\hat\theta_n=(2\bar Y_n-1)/(1-\bar Y_n)$ is well defined for every $n$ large enough, almost surely. Finally, $\hat\theta_n\to(2\mathbb E_\theta(Y)-1)/(1-\mathbb E_\theta(Y))=\theta$ almost surely with respect to $\mathbb P_\theta$. Almost sure convergence implies convergence in probability hence $(\hat\theta_n)_n$ is consistent.

This applies to every i.i.d. random sample with $\mathbb E_\theta(Y)=m(\theta)$, for some homeomorphism $m$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your distribution is a Beta distribution with parameters $\theta+1$ and $1$, that is $$ Y \sim \text{Beta}(\theta+1,1). $$

Consider the case $n=1$, so that $\hat{\theta} = \frac{2Y - 1}{1-Y} = \frac{1}{1-Y} - 2$. Then $$ E[\frac{1}{1-Y}] = (\theta+1) \int_0^1 (1-y)^{-1} y^\theta dy $$
and the integral apparently is unbounded. That is $E[\hat{\theta}] = \infty$ if you will.

share|cite|improve this answer
If $E[ \hat \theta]= \infty$ then how is it an unbiased estimator? – math101 Feb 14 '13 at 5:17
It doesn't seem that it is. If you correctly transcribed all the information, it may be that the person asking the question is mistaken. – Glen_b Feb 14 '13 at 5:23
Ohhh shit. The question states that we must show that the estimator is consistent. Sorry my bad – math101 Feb 14 '13 at 5:25
Well, it depends on whether you have the tools to show the result you need from there. It can be done this way, or there are other ways. Do you know Slutsky's theorem? If not, do you know the Chebyshev and Markov inequalities? – Glen_b Feb 14 '13 at 5:40
@Glen_b None of these is useful here. – Did Feb 14 '13 at 6:49

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.