Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I am taking math class, and I am not sure about LUB and GLB. I need someone to give this dummy a short explanation about them....

On interval (0,10), 0 is a lower bound and 10 is upper bound, but since they are not included in interval I thought 1 and 9 are the least and greatest. Is it right? If [0,10], 0 and 10 are in the interval, so they are the least and greatest.

What is the best way to prove the least and greatest bound? I practiced few it is still not clear.

Thank you so much,

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

The interval $(0,10)$ consists of all real numbers $x$ such that $0\lt x\lt 10$. In particular, $9.93$ is in $(0,10)$, so $9$ is not an upper bound for our set. Similarly, $1$ is not a lower bound.

There is no general way to prove that $b$ is the least upper bound of a set $S$. But the problem naturally breaks up into two parts, which in general should be handled separately.

We need to show that (i) $s\le b$ for every $s$ in $S$ and (ii) there is no "cheaper" upper bound than $b$. That means that for any $b'\lt b$, there is an $s$ in $S$ such that $s\gt b'$.

Let's apply that strategy to $S=(0,10)$.

(i) It is obvious from the definition of $S$ that any $s\in S$ is $\le 10$. In fact, $s\lt 10$.

(ii) Suppose that $b'\lt 10$. We show that $b'$ is not an upper bound of $S$.

If $b'\le 0$, then clearly $b'$ is not an upper bound for $S$. If $b'\ge 0$, let $s=\frac{b'+10}{2}$, the average of $b'$ and $10$. Then $s$ is strictly between $b'$ and $10$. This shows that $b'$ is not an upper bound of $S$.

Greatest lower bounds are handled in basically the same way.

Remark: The little bit about the case $b'\lt 0$ was just pedantry. If $b'=-20$, and $s=\frac{b'+10}{2}$, then $s$ is not in $S$, and we needed $s$ to be in $S$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thank you so much for your help! I do not get a lot of examples in class, so this is really helps me to undertand. – Uka Feb 14 '13 at 22:44
@Uka: You are welcome. Sorry not to be able to give a general recipe: sometimes quite special techniques have to be used. Often, good geometric visualization, plus some writing experience, is enough to produce a proof. – André Nicolas Feb 14 '13 at 22:52

The interval $(0,10)$ includes all real numbers $x$ satisfying the inequality $0<x<10$, not just the integers in that interval. For instance, $0<\frac12<10)$, so $\frac12\in(0,1)$; and $\frac12<1$, so $1$ is not a lower bound for the interval. Similarly, $9$ is not an upper bound: $9+\frac12$ is larger than $9$ and is still in the interval $(0,10)$.

In fact, if $x$ is any element of the interval $(0,10)$, then $0<\frac{x}2<x<10$, so $\frac{x}2$ is also in the interval and is smaller than $x$. This shows that $(0,10)$ has no smallest element. It also shows that no positive real number is a lower bound for the interval. On the other hand, $0<x$ for every $x$ in the interval, so $0$ is a lower bound for the interval; and since no positive number is a lower bound, $0$ must be the greatest lower bound of the interval.

The reasoning showing that $10$ is the least (smallest) upper bound of $(0,10)$ is similar. Every real number $u\ge 10$ is clearly an upper bound. On the other hand, if $x<10$, then either $x<9$, in which case $9$ is a member of $(0,10)$ bigger than $x$, or $$x<\frac12(x+10)<10\;,$$ and $\frac12(x+10)$ is a member of the interval bigger than $x$. ($\frac12(x+10)$ is just the average of $x$ and $10$, which is halfway between $x$ and $10$.) In each case $x$ cannot be an upper bound for $(0,10)$, because something in $(0,10)$ is bigger than $x$. Thus, no number smaller than $10$ is an upper bound for $(0,10)$, and $10$ is an upper bound, so it must be the least upper bound.

If a set has a smallest element, that element is always the greatest lower bound. Similarly, if it has a largest element, that will be the least upper bound. But with a set like $(0,10)$, which has no smallest or largest element, you have to look a bit more closely to see what’s happening.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thank you for your explanation, this is very helpful. I'll work on some more problems for practice. – Uka Feb 14 '13 at 22:43
@Uka: You’re welcome. – Brian M. Scott Feb 14 '13 at 22:43

i think with ma understanding, having a interval(0,10) it is a bounded sequence so to determine your upper bound and lower bound for a bounded sequence, draw a number line and indicate the numbers in the intervals , move to the right hand side, the highest no is your upper bound, and to the left the lowest number is your lower bound

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.