Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have a quick question regarding the proof of Proposition II.3.2 in Farkas & Kra (pg. 40). The proposition is that if $\alpha$ is a square-integrable, $C^1$ 1-form, then $\alpha$ lives in a certain subspace if and only if $\alpha$ is closed. The relevant portion of the proof goes as follows:

Suppose $\alpha$ is closed and that $f$ is a smooth function whose support lives inside a precompact set $D$. The inner product is then calculated as

$(\alpha, *df) = -\iint\limits_D \alpha \wedge d\bar{f}$

$\qquad = -\iint\limits_D [d(\alpha\bar{f}) - d\alpha \wedge \bar{f}]$

$\qquad = -\iint\limits_D d(\alpha\bar{f})$

$\qquad = -\int\limits_{\partial D} \alpha \bar{f} = 0$

I don't understand the very last "= 0" part. Maybe I'm being dense, but just because $\alpha$ is closed doesn't mean $\alpha \bar{f}$ is closed, does it? (I tried writing out $\alpha = g\, dx + h\, dy$, so $\bar{f}\alpha = \bar{f}g\,dx + \bar{f}h\,dy$, then $d(\bar{f}\alpha) = (\bar{f}_x h - \bar{f}_y g) dx\wedge dy$.)

Sorry if this is a stupid, obvious question, but I just don't see it. Many thanks.

share|cite|improve this question

By assumption, $f = 0$ on $\partial D$. (The support is compact in $D$.)

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.