Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $X$ be a Levy process, there is a theorem which says $$ X_{(t-s)^-} - X_t \overset{d}{=} - X_s, $$ for $0 \le s \le t$, $t$ fixed.
How do we proove this without a graphical argument?

In Kyprianou, it goes like this \begin{align} X_{(t-s)^-}-X_t &\overset{a.s.}{=} X_{t-s} - X_t && \text{(quasi left-continuity)} \tag{1} \\ &\overset{a.s}{=} - \left( X_t - X_{t-s} \right) \tag{2} \\ &\overset{d}{=} - X_s \tag{3} \end{align}

Why does (3) follows?

*Kyprianou, Fluctuation of Levy process,lemma 3.4

share|cite|improve this question
Isn't that the stationary increments? – Stefan Hansen Feb 12 '13 at 16:28
@StefanHansen You are right, I understand now. Thanks. – Nicolas Essis-Breton Feb 12 '13 at 16:30

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.