Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This question already has an answer here:

I just wonder: How do you know whether an integral can be solved? For example, exponential integral can not be derived to final result.

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by user7530, Ittay Weiss, Gerry Myerson, Hans Lundmark, Michael Greinecker Feb 12 '13 at 9:35

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

    
What does final result mean? –  Emanuele Paolini Feb 12 '13 at 9:02
add comment

3 Answers 3

You don't solve integrals, you compute them. The integral $$ \int_0^x \frac{e^t}{t}\, dt $$ can be computed as any other integral. Only the result is not a function which you may find in every pocket calculator...

share|improve this answer
    
indefinte integrals are not computed but evaluated. –  Arjang Feb 12 '13 at 9:20
add comment

Integrals are not solved, indefinite integrals are evaluated. One may compute definite integrals. The question you are trying to ask is this: "What integrals can be evaluated in terms of elementary or well known transcedental functions"

Example of transcedental functions : $\sin x , \ln x, e^x $ etc.

share|improve this answer
    
$Ei(x)$ is a well known transcendental function. –  Emanuele Paolini Feb 12 '13 at 9:39
    
The distinction definite/indefinite integrals regarding evaluation/computation seems irrelevant since lots of indefinite integrals are equivalent to definite ones and vice versa. –  Did Feb 12 '13 at 9:40
    
@Did : yes that is correct, but I have not seen any examples of the two being interchanged in books, if I see some examples of them being interchanged in books written by native English speakers then I can agree. –  Arjang Feb 12 '13 at 10:11
1  
Your procedures of agreement are a tad peculiar, to say the least... Since you do not mention books written by native English speakers in your post, my remark fully applies and you might want to reformulate your (at present misleading) post. –  Did Feb 12 '13 at 10:15
    
@Did : If you could adjust the misleading part any way you see fit please, Ill appreciate it. I agree with anything that I either can infer, deduce or see some examples of it around. PS : I did found this answer of yours awesome : math.stackexchange.com/questions/74347/… –  Arjang Feb 12 '13 at 10:24
show 2 more comments

There is no universal criterion, distinguishing which integrals can be computed in elementary functions. (Rational functions of the exponent.)

share|improve this answer
add comment

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.