Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I am working on this problem in Rudin:

Let $L^\infty=L^\infty(m)$, where $m$ is Lebesgue measure on $I=[0,1]$. Show that there is a bounded linear functional $\lambda\neq 0$ on $L^\infty$ that is $0$ on $C(I)$, and that therefore there is no $g\in L^1(m)$ that satisfies $\lambda f=\int_I fg dm$ for every $f\in L^\infty$. Thus $(L^\infty)^*\neq L^1$.

I've figured out all but the part that saids " $(L^\infty)^*\neq L^1$". Most of the problem seems to be showing that the normal method of showing $(L^p)^* \cong L^q$ doesn't work. However, I don't see how that helps me do the last deduction.

share|cite|improve this question
The original problem isn't about reiterating the other proof and finding a gap in the copycat argument — it asks for something much stronger. It is about constructing a specific counterexample to the inclusion $(L^\infty)^* \subseteq L^1 $ (or at least proving its existence). – Erick Wong Feb 12 '13 at 3:53
You know that every $g \in L^1$ gives a linear functional $\lambda_g \in (L^{\infty})^\ast$ by $f \mapsto \int fg$ and that for $g_1 \neq g_2$ you have $\lambda_{g_1} \neq \lambda_{g_2}$. This shows that $L^1 \subseteq (L^\infty)^\ast$. You also know that the only $g \in L^1$ such that $\int fg$ for all $f \in C(I)$ is $g = 0$. Therefore the functional $\lambda$ you have constructed is not of the form $\lambda_g$ for any $g \in L^1$ and hence $L^1 \subsetneqq (L^\infty)^\ast$. – Martin Feb 12 '13 at 6:26
up vote 1 down vote accepted

Every $g \in L^1$ yields a linear functional $\lambda_g \in (L^\infty)^\ast$ defined by $\lambda_g(f) = \int fg\,dm$ on $L^\infty$.

The estimate $\lvert \lambda_g(f)\rvert \leq \lVert f \rVert_\infty \lVert g\rVert_1$ shows that $\lVert \lambda_g\rVert \leq \lVert g\rVert_1$, so $\lambda_g$ is continuous. Taking $$ f(x) = \begin{cases} 0 & \text{if } g(x) = 0 \cr \frac{\overline{g(x)}}{\lvert g(x)\rvert} & \text{if } g(x) \neq 0 \end{cases} $$ we get $\lambda_g(f) = \lVert g\rVert_1$, so $\lVert \lambda_g\lVert \geq \lVert g \rVert_1$. Thus, the linear map $L^1 \to (L^\infty)^\ast, g \mapsto \lambda_g$ is isometric and hence injective. We can therefore view $L^1 \subseteq (L^\infty)^\ast$ as a subspace.

The point of Rudin's exercise is to establish that $L^1 \subsetneqq (L^\infty)^\ast$, in words $L^1$ is a proper subspace of $(L^\infty)^\ast$.

Indeed, let $0 \neq \lambda \in (L^\infty)^\ast$ be a linear functional such that $\lambda(f) = 0$ for all $f \in C(I)$ which you say you have proved to exist. Then $\lambda$ can't be of the form $\lambda = \lambda_g$ for any $g \in L^1$ since for $g \in L^1$ the vanishing $\int gf\,dm = 0$ for all $f \in C(I)$ implies that $g = 0$ and hence $\lambda_g = 0$. But we have $\lambda \neq 0$ and thus $\lambda \in (L^\infty)^\ast \setminus L^1$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Got it. Thanks! – Kevin Feb 12 '13 at 21:56
You're welcome. By the way: $L^1(X,\Sigma,\mu)$ is almost always a proper subspace of $L^\infty(X,\Sigma,\mu)^\ast$ except in very degenerate cases like $X$ a finite set. See When is $L^1 = (L^\infty)^\ast$? for a precise statement. – Martin Feb 12 '13 at 22:10
For $g\in L^1$ such that $\int gf\,dm=0$ for all $f\in C(I)$, then $g=0$, how to show this? – Xiang Yu Jan 5 at 11:59

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.