Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Prove that : $$ \gamma=-\int_0^{1}\ln \ln \left ( \frac{1}{x} \right) \ \mathrm{d}x.$$

where $\gamma$ is Euler's constant ($\gamma \approx 0.57721$).

This integral was mentioned in Wikipedia as in Mathworld , but the solutions I've got uses corollaries from this theorem. Can you give me a simple solution (not using much advanced theorems) or at least some hints.

share|cite|improve this question
How do you define $\gamma$? Your sentence "but the solutions I've got uses corollaries from this theorem" is not so clear. The standard definition is $$\gamma:= \lim_{N\rightarrow \infty}\sum_{k=1}^N \frac{1}{k} -\log N.$$ – Eric Naslund Feb 11 '13 at 20:23
I define $\gamma$ by the sum you mentioned, what I meant by that sentence is that the solutions applies a theorem that I don't know and it is a bit advanced. – aziiri Feb 11 '13 at 20:41
Here is the only way I can think of at the moment. By a substitution, the integral equals $$-\int_0^\infty e^{-x}\log x,$$ and can consider an exponential generating series to see that this is the negative derivative of the Gamma function at $z=1.$ Our goal is now to prove that $\Gamma'(1)=-\gamma$. One way to deduce this is from the functional equation for the zeta function using the Laurent expansion for zeta. This requires a proof that $\gamma$ is in fact the constant term in the Laurent expansion for $\zeta(s)$ around $s=1$, and that is not too hard. – Eric Naslund Feb 11 '13 at 20:48
It's done without using anything very advanced on pages 176-7 of Boros and Moll, Irresistible Integrals. It's a little longer than I'd want to write out. – Gerry Myerson Feb 12 '13 at 1:38
@Ryan, not that I know of, but surely Google would know. – Gerry Myerson Feb 13 '13 at 11:58
up vote 5 down vote accepted

In this answer, it is shown that since $\Gamma$ is log-convex, $$ \frac{\Gamma'(x)}{\Gamma(x)}=-\gamma+\sum_{k=1}^\infty\left(\frac1k-\frac1{k+x-1}\right)\tag{1} $$ Setting $x=1$ yields $$ \Gamma'(1)=-\gamma\tag{2} $$ The integral definition of $\Gamma$ says $$ \begin{align} \Gamma(x)&=\int_0^\infty t^{x-1}\,e^{-t}\,\mathrm{d}t\\ \Gamma'(x)&=\int_0^\infty\log(t)\,t^{x-1}\,e^{-t}\,\mathrm{d}t\\ \Gamma'(1)&=\int_0^\infty\log(t)\,e^{-t}\,\mathrm{d}t\tag{3} \end{align} $$ Putting together $(2)$ and $(3)$ gives $$ \int_0^\infty\log(t)\,e^{-t}\,\mathrm{d}t=-\gamma\tag{4} $$ Substituting $t\mapsto\log(1/t)$ transforms $(4)$ to $$ \int_0^1\log(\log(1/t))\,\mathrm{d}t=-\gamma\tag{5} $$

share|cite|improve this answer

$$I = \int_0^1 \log (-\log x)\,dx = \int_0^\infty e^{-x} \log(x)\,dx$$

Noting that

$$\Gamma(s) = \int_0^\infty e^{-x} x^{s-1}\, dx$$

we find that

$$\Gamma'(1) = I = -\gamma$$

share|cite|improve this answer
I took the liberty to change $n$ to $s$. Hope you don't mind. – Pedro Tamaroff Jun 28 '13 at 1:50
No problem, @Peter – Argon Jun 28 '13 at 1:51
Or directly from Euler's initial formula for the Gamma/factorial function: $$n!=\int_0^1(-\ln x)^ndx\iff\Gamma'(n+1)=\int_0^1(-\ln x)^n\ln(-\ln x)dx\iff\Gamma'(1)=I.$$ – Lucian Dec 13 '13 at 12:18
@Pedro why did you do that? – draks ... Mar 20 '14 at 4:46
@draks... The Leprechaun threatened to burn my house down. – Pedro Tamaroff Mar 20 '14 at 4:58

You can see a proof here where we use that $$\Gamma(z) = \frac{\exp{(-\gamma z)}}{z}\prod\limits_{n=1}^\infty\frac{\exp \left({\frac z n}\right)}{1+\dfrac z n }$$

There is another proof here where we use $$\gamma=\lim\limits_{n\to\infty}\left( H_n-\log n\right)$$

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.