Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

This is a question due to the answer of Did in this post Independent increments of $X_t:=\int_0^t\phi(s) dW_s$. Precisely, we assume that the dynamics of a stock prices follows


where $\phi_t$ is a deterministic function, and assume bounded. Hence $S_t=\mathcal{E}(\phi\bullet W)=S_0e^{\int_0^t\phi_sdW_s-\frac{1}{2}\int_0^t\phi_s^2ds}$. For simplicity, $S_0=1$ and, regarding the question above, $X_t:=\int_0^t\phi_sdW_s$. Let $K>0$ be a constant, and we want to find the arbitrage free price of an European call option with strike $K$ and maturity $T$ at time $t$, i.e.


As usual, with $A=\{S_T>K\}$ write this as


The second term can be easily calculated, using the above question, i.e.


since $\frac{S_T}{S_t}$ is independent of $\mathcal{F}_t$ and $\frac{K}{S_t}$ is $\mathcal{F}_t$ measurable, we get


where $Y$ is lognormal distributed with mean $-\frac{1}{2}\int_t^T\phi_s^2 ds$ and variance $\int_t^T\phi_s^2ds$. To calculate the first conditional expectation, $E[S_T\mathbf1_A|\mathcal{F}_t]$, I would define a new measure (on $\mathcal{F}_T$ through


since $S_T$ is a $P$ Martingale and $E[S_0]=1$ (if $S_0\not=1$, just use the measure $\frac{dQ}{dP}:=\frac{S_T}{S_0}$). Hence the density process is given by $Z_t:=E[\frac{dQ}{dP}|\mathcal{F}_t]=S_t$. Using Bayse, we get


If we know that under $Q$, $\frac{S_T}{S_t}$ is still independent of $\mathcal{F}_t$, we could conclude in the same way as above. If this is not the case, how would you then calculate the first conditional expectation?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

To calculate the first conditional expectation, $\mathbb E[S_T\mathbf 1_A|\mathcal{F}_t]$, I would...

...simply note (as you already explained yourself) that $S_T=YS_t$ where the distribution of $Y$ is lognormal with known parameters, and $Y$ is independent of $\mathcal F_t$.

Since $A=[S_T\gt K]=[YS_t\gt K]$, this remark yields the identity $$\mathbb E[S_T\mathbf 1_A|\mathcal{F}_t]=\mathbb E[YS_t\mathbf 1_{YS_t\gt K}|\mathcal{F}_t]=G(S_t), $$ where the function $G$ is defined by $$ G(x)=\mathbb E(Yx\mathbf 1_{xY\gt K})=x\mathbb E(Y\mathbf 1_{Y\gt K/x}). $$

share|cite|improve this answer
ok, this seems easier. However I guess the question about the independence can be answered with yes (if we assume that $\mathcal{F}_t$ is generated by $W_t$. Using Girsanov, we can find a new Brownian motion (w.r.t to $Q$). Since the filtration generated by these Brownian Motions are the same, the result should still be valid. Is this correct? – math Feb 10 '13 at 14:46

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.