Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

$X_1$ is a set of numbers which are neither prime nor composite. $X_2$ is a set of numbers from 1 to 40 that are multiples of 10.

Find $X_1 \cup X_2$).

When I tried I got the answer as $\{1,10,20,30,40\}$
There is only one number which is neither prime nor composite, i.e. $1$ [I didn't know it included $0$]
$\Rightarrow X_1 = \{1\}, X_2 = \{10,20,30,40\}$
$X_1 \cup X_2 = \{1,10,20,30,40\}$.

But in the book it is written:
There is only one number which is neither prime nor composite, i.e. $0$
$\Rightarrow X_1 = \{0\}, X_2 = \{10,20,30,40\}$
$X_1 \cup X_2 = \{0,10,20,30,40\}$.

So, can you help me with this? Thanks.

share|cite|improve this question
Could you make sure you're talking of integer or even natural numbers? – DonAntonio Feb 10 '13 at 10:19
Not even natural numbers – chndn Feb 10 '13 at 10:20
The question just says 'numbers' so i think it is non negative numbers – chndn Feb 10 '13 at 10:21
$\sqrt 2$ is neither orime nor composite ... – Hagen von Eitzen Feb 10 '13 at 10:21
The book, if it says what you say it says, is wrong. $1$ is neither prime nor composite. – Gerry Myerson Feb 10 '13 at 10:53
up vote 1 down vote accepted

I believe that this is simply mistake - someone printed $0$ instead of $1$ in the answers. And then your solution is correct. (But this explanation becomes more improbable if the answer mentions $0$ more than once. Then I believe it's even bigger author's mistake - in thinking instead of typing.)

Number $1$ is usually excluded from primes because of uniqueness of natural number factorization ("Every number can be expressed as product of primes in only one way, if order is unimportant") - because number $1$ as prime would allow many different factorizations like $2=1\cdot 2=1\cdot 1\cdot 2=\ldots$

Also the context - primes and compounds - usually doesn't include number $0$ (maybe only as reminder).

share|cite|improve this answer
You may be correct. thnx – chndn Feb 10 '13 at 12:21

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.