Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $(a_n)$ be a sequence of real numbers. Suppose each of the subsequences $(a_{2n}),(a_{2n+1})$ and $(a_{3n})$ converges to $p,q$ and $r$, respectively. Show that $p=r$ and $q=r$ and hence conclude that $(a_n)$ converges. To prove $p=r$, I consider a subsequence of $(a_{2n})$ and $(a_{3n})$ , which is $(a_{6n})$. Then I say clearly $(a_{6n})$ converges to $p$ and $r$ and hence $p=r$. Is this proof work?

share|cite|improve this question
Yes, this works perfectly. – 1015 Feb 9 '13 at 14:52
As Julien says, yes; and you can use a similar idea for the second part (cross multiply the indices is probably the easiest way). – gnometorule Feb 9 '13 at 14:56
And for the other equality, consider for instance $(a_{3(2n+1)}=a_{2(3n+1)+1})$. – 1015 Feb 9 '13 at 14:56
up vote 0 down vote accepted

So, just summarising the comments:

Yes, $a_{6n}$ is a subsequence of $a_{2n}$ and $a_{3n}$, so it converges to both $p$ and $r$, thus $p=r$.

Similarly, $a_{6n+3}=a_{3(2n+1)}=a_{2(3n+1)+1}$ is a subsequence of $a_{3n}$ and $a_{2n+1}$, so it converges to both $r$ and $q$, thus $r=q$.

So $p=r=q$ and, as $a_{2n}$ and $a_{2n+1}$ covers all of $a_n$, it converges.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.