Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm sure some (if not most) have seen this by now and since I'm fairly new to real deep mathematical explorations I'm stumped as to why this would be true.

For class I was asked to cut out an 8" x 8" square and then asked to cut the square into 2 right triangles each of base height 3" and base 8" and two trapezoids each of base1 3" and base2 5" with height 5".

I was then asked to rearrange the shapes to make an 5" x 13" rectangle and sure enough the pieces fit snuggly. Now 5" x 13" will not give us the same area that we initially had. Measuring the pieces separately one would get that each trapezoid has an area of 20 inches squared and each triangle has an area of 12 inches squared.

Any explanations please, thank you!

share|cite|improve this question
What looks like a diagonal straight line isn't a straight line. There is a long and very narrow gap. – André Nicolas Feb 9 '13 at 5:56
Should we close as an abstract duplicate of ? – Zev Chonoles Feb 9 '13 at 5:57
@Ceelos I've removed the tag dimension-theory and added geometry and paradox which I think are more appropriate. – EuYu Feb 9 '13 at 5:57

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.