Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Can anyone see why it is that if $a$ is large, then $$\log (\sum_m\sum_n \exp(-knm/a)))$$ where $k$ is a constant and $n,m$ take values $1,2,3,...$, can be approximated by $${a\pi^2\over 6k }$$? Cheers!

As Gerry suggested, it would probably help if I added more context. Let $$Z= \sum_m\sum_n \exp(-{nm\hbar \omega\over k_B T}))$$ and the free energy is $$A= -k_BT \log Z$$ and for this $Z$, and at large  $T$, $A$ is said to be approximately $$-k_b^2T^2\pi^2\over 6\hbar \omega$$

share|cite|improve this question
Source?${}{}{}$ – Gerry Myerson Feb 8 '13 at 11:31
@GerryMyerson: it's from some notes I have... – user61472 Feb 8 '13 at 11:38
@GerryMyerson: I have added more info. :) – user61472 Feb 8 '13 at 11:57
@user61472 Well, at least $\sum_n e^{-knm/a} = 1/(e^{k m/a}-1)$ – Valtteri Feb 8 '13 at 12:13
@GerryMyerson: this looks like the OP wants to evaluate something called a partition function in statistical mechanics. – Ron Gordon Feb 8 '13 at 14:48

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.