Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $E/F$ be finite separable extension. Is there any proof of the fact that there are only finitely many intermediate fields without using primitive element theorem or fundamental theorem of Galois theory?

share|cite|improve this question
What's the motivation for not wanting to use either of those results? Considering the primitive element theorem is often stated as a finite extension has a primitive element if and only if there are a finite number of intermediate fields. – JSchlather Feb 7 '13 at 14:48
If one cannot use galois-theory, then why tag this galois-theory? – awllower Feb 7 '13 at 15:00
Because I thought it is related to galois theory or can be used in galois theory. – Mohan Feb 7 '13 at 15:02
Indeed. Thanks for the clarification. – awllower Feb 7 '13 at 15:11
@Mohan: Lang in his Algebra shows directly that a finite separable extension has a primitive element, and thus your result follows using the (stronger form of) The Primitive Element Theorem but no Galois Theory. (This argument is replicated in $\S 8$ of my field theory notes: I think this is not what you are looking for. Could you amplify on why you want to avoid the Primitive Element Theorem and Galois Theory? – Pete L. Clark Mar 3 '13 at 17:57

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.