Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Find a linear transformation $T\colon \mathbb{R}^2 \to P_2(\mathbb{R})$ such that $T(1,2) = 3 + 4x^2$ and $T(3,5) = 1 - 2x + 3x^2$.

I was thinking of approaching the problem the following way:

$$ T \left( \begin{matrix} 1 \\ 2 \end{matrix} \right) = \left( \begin{matrix} 3 \\ 0 \\ 4 \end{matrix} \right) $$

$$ T \left( \begin{matrix} 3 \\ 5 \end{matrix} \right) = \left( \begin{matrix} 1 \\ -2 \\ 3 \end{matrix} \right) $$

$$ \text{Let } T = \left( \begin{matrix}A & B \\ C & D \\ E & F \end{matrix} \right) \text{ then } $$

$$ \begin{align*} A + 2B = 3\\ C + 2B = 0\\ E + 2F = 4\\ 3A = 5B = 1\\ 3C + 5D = -2\\ 3E + 5F = 3 \end{align*} $$

But converting this system of equations into a matrix and performing row reduction gave me

$$ T = \left( \begin{matrix} -13 & 8\\-16 & 46/5 \\-14&9 \end{matrix}\right) $$

which when checked against the two given untransformed vectors do not give me the right result.

In addition, the question asks to prove that this linear transformation T is unique. How do I show that a transformation is indeed unique?

share|improve this question
    
For future reference, questions should be asked as such. Using the imperative mode implies that you are giving orders. –  JavaMan Mar 29 '11 at 2:15
    
The second equation you derived for $T$ is incorrect: it should be $C+2D=0$, not $C+2B=0$, and your solution does not satisfy this. –  Arturo Magidin Mar 29 '11 at 4:20
    
I'm sorry if my question sounded like a command, that was most certainly not my intention. Thank you Arturo for pointing this out, it appears like I was too tired to notice this stupid mistake. –  Millianz Mar 29 '11 at 15:37
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 3 down vote accepted

Note that $(1,2)$ and $(3,5)$ form a basis of $\mathbb{R}^2$. A linear transformation is completely determined by its action on a basis, so that gives uniqueness.

More explicitly: Since $(0,1) = 3(1,2) - (3,5)$ and $(1,0)=-5(1,2)+2(3,5)$, then knowing that $T$ does to $(1,2)$ and to $(3,5)$, and knowing that $T$ is linear, tells you what $T$ does to $(1,0)$ and to $(0,1)$, which tells you what $T$ does to everything, and gives you an easy way to write down what $T$ does to any vector $(a,b)$ (in terms of what it does to $(1,0)$ and to $(0,1)$).

Since everything will be forced by the values of $T(1,2)$ and of $T(3,5)$, if $U$ were any linear transformation that has the same values at $(1,2)$ and at $(3,5)$ as $T$ does, then it would also agree with $T$ on $(1,0)$ and on $(0,1)$, and therefore $T$ and $U$ would agree everywhere, that is, $T=U$.

(This is the "standard" way of proving uniqueness: assume you have two objects [in this case, linear transformations] that have the properties you want, and show that this implies that they are equal.)

The moral here is: if you know what a linear transformation does to a basis, you know what the linear transformation does to everything. )And you can define a linear transformation by specifying what it does to a basis.)

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.