Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $i_{q0} : M\rightarrow M\times N$, $i_{q0}(p) = (p, q0)$ be a mapping between smooth manifolds. I need some hints to show that it is $C^{\infty}$.

I have so far... Let $(U,\phi)$ and $(V,\psi)$ be charts about $p$ and $i_{q0}$, and let $r^{i}$ be the $ith$ coordinate function on Euclidean space. Then we need to show that $\frac{\partial (r^{i}\circ \psi \circ i_{q0} \circ \phi^{-1})}{\partial r^{j}}$ exists and is continuous at $\phi(p)$ and that we can keep taking partial derivatives.

share|cite|improve this question
The map $i_{q_0}$ of your question is simply the inclusion map $(x^1,\dots,x^n)\to (x^1,\dots,x^n,0,\dots,0)$ in (an appropriate choice of) local coordinates where $M$ is a smooth $n$-manifold and $N$ is a smooth $m$-manifold (where $m$ is the number of zeros in $(x^1,\dots,x^n,0,\dots,0)$). Clearly, this (inclusion) map is smooth. – Amitesh Datta Feb 16 '12 at 15:06

The smooth structure on $M \times N$ is understood to be the maximal atlas which includes all charts which are products of charts from $M$ and $N$. You do not need to show that the composition of transition maps with your given function are smooth for every choice of charts; you only need to show there is at least one such chart-- this is the point of the axiom which states that overlapping charts are compatible.

share|cite|improve this answer

I think I got it. Here goes...

Let $(U,\phi)$ be any chart about $p \in M$. Then for any chart $(V,\psi)$ about $q0 \in N$, $(U \times V, \phi \times \psi)$ is a chart about $(p,q0) \in M\times N$. And for $\phi(p) \in R^{m}$, say $\phi(p) = (p^{1},...,p^{m})$, $r^{i}\circ(\phi\times\psi)\circ i_{q0}\circ\phi^{-1}(p^{1},...,p^{m}) = r^{i}\circ((p^{1},...,p^{m}),\psi(q0))$.

Then the partial derivatives are easy to compute after that.

share|cite|improve this answer
Or maybe you can first show that the image set is a submanifold of MxN, as, e.g., the zero set of a smooth map, say, define the map as f-x for x in M, and use bump functions to extend it. Then your map is the inclusion map of a submanifold into a manifold, which is smooth when you use the subspace topology for M – gary May 19 '11 at 5:47

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.