The whole cone and the upper cone are similar. That means that one is just a scaled version of the other.
Let $\lambda$ be the ratio of the base radius of the whole cone to the base radius of the upper cone.
If the linear dimensions of an object are scaled by the factor $\lambda$, then areas are scaled by the factor $\lambda^2$, and volumes are scaled by the factor $\lambda^3$.
Thus the ratio of the volumes is $\lambda^3$. We know that $\lambda^3=2$, so $\lambda=2^{1/3}$.
Remark: We could let the base radius of the upper cone be $r$, and let its height be $h$. Suppose that the base radius of the whole cone is $\lambda r$. By using similar triangles you can then show that the height of the whole cone is $\lambda h$.
So the volume of the upper cone is $\frac{1}{3}\pi r^2 h$, and the volume of the whole cone is $\frac{1}{3}(\lambda r)^2(\lambda h)$. This is $\frac{\lambda^3}{3}r^2h$.
Find the ratio of the volumes. We get $\lambda^3$. Set this equal to $2$.
Same result, but a whole lot of unnecessary work!