Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

The article is 'Hadamard and Calabi Yau conjectures on negatively curved an minimal surfaces' Nadirashvili. In the proof of proposition 4.3 it asserts that the function y is holomorphic. I'm not sure about it (actually i think it is false). What do you think about it? Thank you for your help.

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 1 down vote accepted

I agree, this part is wrong as stated, although the ideas behind it are sound. Pascal Collin and Harold Rosenberg did a great service to the community by publishing the note

P. Collin and H. Rosenberg, Notes sur la démonstration de N. Nadirashvili des conjectures de Hadamard et Calabi-Yau, Bull. Sci. Math. 123 (1999), no. 7, 563–575.

in which they clarify and correct various details. In particular, the appendix of this note contains a cleaned-up proof of Proposition 3.4, which provides the missing details concerning the zeroes of the various functions involved.

References: Collin-Rosenberg, Nadirashvili (also preprint), and first part of this discussion.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.